Literature DB >> 20855114

Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study.

Quan Dong Nguyen1, Syed Mahmood Shah, Afsheen A Khwaja, Roomasa Channa, Elham Hatef, Diana V Do, David Boyer, Jeffery S Heier, Prema Abraham, Allen B Thach, Eugene S Lit, Bradley S Foster, Erik Kruger, Pravin Dugel, Thomas Chang, Arup Das, Thomas A Ciulla, John S Pollack, Jennifer I Lim, Dean Eliott, Dean Eliot, Peter A Campochiaro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effects of ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with DME.
METHODS: Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 0.5 mg RBZ at baseline and months 1, 3, and 5 (group 1), focal or grid laser photocoagulation at baseline and month 3 if needed (group 2), or a combination of 0.5 mg RBZ and focal or grid laser at baseline and month 3 (group 3). Starting at month 6, if retreatment criteria were met, all subjects could be treated with RBZ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 24.
RESULTS: After the primary end point at month 6, most patients in all groups were treated only with RBZ, and the mean number of injections was 5.3, 4.4, and 2.9 during the 18-month follow-up period in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the 33 patients in group 1, 34 patients in group 2, and 34 patients in group 3 who remained in the study through 24 months, the mean improvement in BCVA was 7.4, 0.5, and 3.8 letters at the 6-month primary end point, compared with 7.7, 5.1, and 6.8 letters at month 24, and the percentage of patients who gained 3 lines or more of BCVA was 21, 0, and 6 at month 6, compared with 24, 18, and 26 at month 24. The percentage of patients with 20/40 or better Snellen equivalent at month 24 was 45% in group 1, 44% in group 2, and 35% in group 3. Mean foveal thickness (FTH), defined as center subfield thickness, at month 24 was 340 μm, 286 μm, and 258 μm for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the percentage of patients with center subfield thickness of 250 μm or less was 36%, 47%, and 68%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular injections of RBZ provided benefit for patients with DME for at least 2 years, and when combined with focal or grid laser treatments, the amount of residual edema was reduced, as were the frequency of injections needed to control edema. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20855114     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  185 in total

1.  Beyond AREDS: is there a place for antioxidant therapy in the prevention/treatment of eye disease?

Authors:  Renu A Kowluru; Qing Zhong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  [Navigated retinal laser therapy].

Authors:  M Kernt; M Ulbig; A Kampik; A S Neubauer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

4.  Comparison of time- and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in management of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Melissa M Liu; Yulia Wolfson; Susan B Bressler; Diana V Do; Howard S Ying; Neil M Bressler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Anti-VEGF versus dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the management of Centre involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CiDME): a randomized study.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Keerthi Bellala; Pankaj Dongre; Prahalad Reddy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  The role of O-GlcNAc signaling in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Richard D Semba; Hu Huang; Gerard A Lutty; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Gerald W Hart
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  [Diagnosis, therapy and follow up of diabetic eye disease].

Authors:  Michael Stur; Stefan Egger; Anton Haas; Gerhard Kieselbach; Stefan Mennel; Reinhard Michl; Michael Roden; Ulrike Stolba; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Current treatments in diabetic macular oedema: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Alexander Ford; Noemi Lois; Pamela Royle; Christine Clar; Deepson Shyangdan; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Current and future management of diabetic retinopathy: a personalized evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Fante; Thomas W Gardner; Jeffrey M Sundstrom
Journal:  Diabetes Manag (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-01

10.  South Asian diabetic macular oedema treated with ranibizumab (ADMOR)-real-life experience.

Authors:  F Ghanchi; C A Hazel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.