Literature DB >> 20854458

Detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell substrates using reverse transcription-PCR assays.

M Peredeltchouk1, S A Wilson David, B Bhattacharya, D V Volokhov, V Chizhikov.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the limit of detection (LOD) and the feasibility of 16S rRNA-based reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for advanced detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell substrates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RT-PCR approach is based on detecting the 16S rRNA molecules that, in contrast to genomic bacterial DNA, are represented by multiple copies in mycoplasma cell. The number of 16S rRNA molecules in mycoplasma cells of five species i.e. Mycoplasma arginini, Myc. fermentans, Myc. hyorhinis, Myc. orale and Acholeplasma laidlawii, all known to be frequent cell line contaminants in industrial and research laboratories, was measured using molecular methods. The results of two independently prepared mycoplasma cultures harvested at the stationary phase of their growth showed that the 16S rRNA copy number per cell varied in the range from about 400 to 2000 copies, depending on species, but stayed close between different preparations of one species. The assessment of the LOD of the in-house 16S rRNA-based RT-PCR was performed using samples of MDCK cell culture spiked with different amounts of five aforementioned mycoplasma species. To minimize the bias in methods comparison, the LOD of the RT-PCR assay was expressed in terms of genome equivalents (GEs) and compared with that determined for highly optimized 16S rDNA-based mycoplasma testing methods previously described in scientific literature.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that the in-house 16S rRNA-based RT-PCR assay was able to reliably detect the presence of less than one mycoplasma GE that is at least 10-fold higher of the LOD previously determined for well-optimized 16S rDNA-based assays developed and described by other researchers. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of the study showed that rapid RT-PCR methods based on the detection of bacterial 16S rRNA are able to expedite mycoplasma testing of cell cultures (1-2 days vs 28 days) and to ensure the limits of detection comparable to that of currently used culture-based mycoplasma testing methods. Journal of Applied Microbiology
© 2010 The Society for Applied Microbiology. No claim to US Government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854458     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04853.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biochemical test in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in human and animal cell lines stored in the National Cell Bank of Iran.

Authors:  Vahid Molla Kazemiha; Amir Amanzadeh; Arash Memarnejadian; Shahram Azari; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Reza Mahdian; Shahin Bonakdar
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  World Health Organization International Standard To Harmonize Assays for Detection of Mycoplasma DNA.

Authors:  C Micha Nübling; Sally A Baylis; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Thomas Montag-Lessing; Michael Chudy; Julia Kreß; Ursula Ulrych; Stefan Czurda; Renate Rosengarten
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Assessing mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures by qPCR using a set of universal primer pairs targeting a 1.5 kb fragment of 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Audrey Jean; Florence Tardy; Omran Allatif; Isabelle Grosjean; Bariza Blanquier; Denis Gerlier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tumor-Associated Macrophages Induce Endocrine Therapy Resistance in ER+ Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Andrés M Castellaro; María C Rodriguez-Baili; Cecilia E Di Tada; Germán A Gil
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  The intracellular bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii exerts an inhibitory effect on the apoptosis of tick cells.

Authors:  Larissa Almeida Martins; Giuseppe Palmisano; Mauro Cortez; Rebeca Kawahara; José Mario de Freitas Balanco; André Fujita; Beatriz Iglesias Alonso; Darci Moraes Barros-Battesti; Gloria Regina Cardoso Braz; Lucas Tirloni; Eliane Esteves; Sirlei Daffre; Andréa Cristina Fogaça
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Microbiological identification and analysis of waterfowl livers collected from backyard farms in southern China.

Authors:  Rongchang Liu; Cuiteng Chen; Yu Huang; Longfei Cheng; Ronghui Lu; Guanghua Fu; Shaohua Shi; Hongmei Chen; Chunhe Wan; Qiuling Fu; Jiansheng Lin
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.