BACKGROUND: The aim was to derive Type 2 diabetes prediction models for the older population and to check to what degree addition of 2-h glucose measurements (oral glucose tolerance test) and biomarkers improves the predictive power of risk scores which are based on non-biochemical as well as conventional clinical parameters. METHODS: Oral glucose tolerance tests were carried out in a population-based sample of 1353 subjects, aged 55-74 years (62% response) in Augsburg (Southern Germany) from 1999 to 2001. The cohort was reinvestigated in 2006-2008. Of those individuals without diabetes at baseline, 887 (74%) participated in the follow-up. Ninety-three (10.5%) validated diabetes cases occurred during the follow-up. In logistic regression analyses for model 1, variables were selected from personal characteristics and additional variables were selected from routinely measurable blood parameters (model 2) and from 2-h glucose, adiponectin, insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (model 3). RESULTS: Age, sex, BMI, parental diabetes, smoking and hypertension were selected for model 1. Model 2 additionally included fasting glucose, HbA(1c) and uric acid. The same variables plus 2-h glucose were selected for model 3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased from 0.763 (model 1) to 0.844 (model 2) and 0.886 (model 3) (P<0.01). Biomarkers such as adiponectin and insulin did not improve the predictive abilities of models 2 and 3. Cross-validation and bootstrap-corrected model performance indicated high internal validity. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study in an older population provides models to predict the future risk of Type 2 diabetes. The OGTT, but not biomarkers, improved discrimination of incident diabetes.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to derive Type 2 diabetes prediction models for the older population and to check to what degree addition of 2-h glucose measurements (oral glucose tolerance test) and biomarkers improves the predictive power of risk scores which are based on non-biochemical as well as conventional clinical parameters. METHODS: Oral glucose tolerance tests were carried out in a population-based sample of 1353 subjects, aged 55-74 years (62% response) in Augsburg (Southern Germany) from 1999 to 2001. The cohort was reinvestigated in 2006-2008. Of those individuals without diabetes at baseline, 887 (74%) participated in the follow-up. Ninety-three (10.5%) validated diabetes cases occurred during the follow-up. In logistic regression analyses for model 1, variables were selected from personal characteristics and additional variables were selected from routinely measurable blood parameters (model 2) and from 2-h glucose, adiponectin, insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (model 3). RESULTS: Age, sex, BMI, parental diabetes, smoking and hypertension were selected for model 1. Model 2 additionally included fasting glucose, HbA(1c) and uric acid. The same variables plus 2-h glucose were selected for model 3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased from 0.763 (model 1) to 0.844 (model 2) and 0.886 (model 3) (P<0.01). Biomarkers such as adiponectin and insulin did not improve the predictive abilities of models 2 and 3. Cross-validation and bootstrap-corrected model performance indicated high internal validity. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study in an older population provides models to predict the future risk of Type 2 diabetes. The OGTT, but not biomarkers, improved discrimination of incident diabetes.
Authors: Peter Manu; Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste; James Tsang; Barbara A Napolitano; Martin L Lesser; Christoph U Correll Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Akram Alyass; Peter Almgren; Mikael Akerlund; Jonathan Dushoff; Bo Isomaa; Peter Nilsson; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Valeriya Lyssenko; Leif Groop; David Meyre Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ali Abbasi; Eva Corpeleijn; Linda M Peelen; Ron T Gansevoort; Paul E de Jong; Rijk O B Gans; Wolfgang Rathmann; Bernd Kowall; Christine Meisinger; Hans L Hillege; Ronald P Stolk; Gerjan Navis; Joline W J Beulens; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Christopher Jepson; Jesse Y Hsu; Michael J Fischer; John W Kusek; James P Lash; Ana C Ricardo; Jeffrey R Schelling; Harold I Feldman Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 8.860