Literature DB >> 20854013

Evaluation of bystander exposures to asbestos in occupational settings: a review of the literature and application of a simple eddy diffusion model.

Ellen P Donovan1, Brooke L Donovan, Jennifer Sahmel, Paul K Scott, Dennis J Paustenbach.   

Abstract

This article presents a review of the publicly available information as it relates to airborne asbestos concentrations at varying distances from a source in an occupational environment. Personal and area samples collected 5-75 feet from the primary worker from workplace surveys conducted in the 1970s and area samples collected 5-50 feet from the primary worker during more recent simulation studies were identified, compiled, and analyzed. As expected, airborne asbestos concentrations generally decreased with distance from the worker who performed a given task. Based on this review, however, the authors found that no systematic research to quantitatively relate fiber concentration with distance from the source (including consideration of fiber length, dilution ventilation, and initial momentum of the particle) has been conducted to date. A simple mathematical model was therefore used, and the results were considered, along with available published data comparing exposure data for both workers and persons/areas near workers. From this analysis, the authors offer guidance for estimating airborne asbestos concentrations at distance from a source. Based on the available data and our modeling results, the authors propose the following approach as a rule of thumb: for persons 1-5 feet from the source, airborne asbestos concentrations can be roughly approximated at 50% of the source concentration; 35% at >5-10 feet, 10% for >10-30 feet, and less than 1% at distances greater than 30 feet. This approach should be helpful for bracketing the range of likely exposures to bystanders being evaluated in asbestos-related dose-reconstruction analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854013     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2010.506639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  6 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of airborne asbestos fiber concentrations from work with or around asbestos-containing floor tile.

Authors:  Angela L Perez; Mindy L Nelson; Thales J Cheng; Chris E Comerford; Paul K Scott
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-10-25

2.  Dust diseases and the legacy of corporate manipulation of science and law.

Authors:  David Egilman; Tess Bird; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-04

3.  Changing pattern in malignant mesothelioma survival.

Authors:  Jennifer Faig; Suzanne Howard; Edward A Levine; Gary Casselman; Mary Hesdorffer; Jill A Ohar
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  The natural reduction of threat in selected systems of old buildings containing asbestos.

Authors:  Andrzej Obmiński
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of Airborne Asbestos Concentrations Associated with the Operation and Maintenance of Brakes and Clutches on Nonautomated Heavy Equipment.

Authors:  J Sahmel; H Avens; T Ferracini; A Banducci; K Rickabaugh
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-04-22

6.  Asbestos Exposure in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma included in the PRIMATE Study, Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Dario Consonni; Francesca Borghi; Sabrina Rovelli; Andrea Cattaneo; Carolina Zellino; Barbara Dallari; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Hans Kromhout; Susan Peters; Luciano Riboldi; Domenico Maria Cavallo; Carolina Mensi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.