Literature DB >> 20853988

Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation.

Kevin M Williams1, Craig Nathanson, Delroy L Paulhus.   

Abstract

Despite much research, skepticism remains over the possibility of profiling scholastic cheaters. However, several relevant predictor variables and newer diagnostic tools have been overlooked. We remedy this deficit with a series of three studies. Study 1 was a large-scale survey of a broad range of personality predictors of self-reported cheating. Significant predictors included the Dark Triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy) as well as low agreeableness and low conscientiousness. Only psychopathy remained significant in a multiple regression. Study 2 replicated this pattern using a naturalistic, behavioral indicator of cheating, namely, plagiarism as indexed by the Internet service Turn-It-In. Poor verbal ability was also an independent predictor. Study 3 examined possible motivational mediators of the association between psychopathy and cheating. Unrestrained achievement and moral inhibition were successful mediators whereas fear of punishment was not. Practical implications for researchers and educators are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20853988     DOI: 10.1037/a0020773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  9 in total

1.  When Friends' and Society's Expectations Collide: A Longitudinal Study of Moral Decision-Making and Personality across College.

Authors:  Kathryn L Bollich; Patrick L Hill; Peter D Harms; Joshua J Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Better Than Its Reputation? Gossip and the Reasons Why We and Individuals With "Dark" Personalities Talk About Others.

Authors:  Freda-Marie Hartung; Constanze Krohn; Marie Pirschtat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating.

Authors:  Kiata Rundle; Guy J Curtis; Joseph Clare
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

4.  The effects of personality traits and attitudes towards the rule on academic dishonesty among university students.

Authors:  Hongyu Wang; Yanyan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Machiavellian Medical Students Report More Academic Misconduct: A Cocktail Fuelled by Psychological and Contextual Factors.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Veríssimo; George A M Conrado; Joselina Barbosa; Sandra F Gomes; Milton Severo; Pedro Oliveira; Laura Ribeiro
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  Machiavellian Ways to Academic Cheating: A Mediational and Interactional Model.

Authors:  Claudio Barbaranelli; Maria L Farnese; Carlo Tramontano; Roberta Fida; Valerio Ghezzi; Marinella Paciello; Philip Long
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-14

7.  The Dark Side of Emotion Recognition - Evidence From Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and China.

Authors:  Helena S Schmitt; Cornelia Sindermann; Mei Li; Yina Ma; Keith M Kendrick; Benjamin Becker; Christian Montag
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-09

8.  Angels and Demons: The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Machiavellian Employees' Work Behaviors.

Authors:  Frank D Belschak; Deanne N Den Hartog; Annebel H B De Hoogh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  Bridging Personality and Online Prosocial Behavior: The Roles of Empathy, Moral Identity, and Social Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Jie Leng; Qingke Guo; Bingqing Ma; Shuyue Zhang; Peng Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.