Literature DB >> 20853410

The effectiveness of indigestible markers for identifying individual animal feces and their prevalence of use in North American zoos.

Grace Fuller1, Susan W Margulis, Rachel Santymire.   

Abstract

Techniques for analyzing hormone metabolites in animal excreta have created many opportunities for noninvasive monitoring of health, reproduction, and welfare in zoo animals, but can be difficult to implement when individual samples are not readily identifiable in animal groups. A common approach to this problem is to feed animals an indigestible marker that subsequently appears in feces, but there has been little systematic research on the use of such "fecal markers." First, we used an online survey to assess the prevalence of fecal marker use in North American zoological institutions. Second, we conducted a series of experimental tests utilizing commonly employed fecal markers in a variety of typical zoo taxa to determine the: (1) effectiveness of several markers to accurately distinguish samples in a variety of species, (2) minimum quantity of marker needed for detection, and (3) length of time between ingestion and detection in the feces. The majority of the 45 institutions that completed the survey reported using fecal markers with their collections. The survey also revealed that the most frequently used markers are seeds/grains and food colorants, with the former generally used in Carnivora and the latter in Primates. Our experimental data confirmed the success of these taxa/marker combinations and also revealed that food colorants function as markers in a variety of avian, reptilian, and mammalian species. Our data describe successful fecal markers for a wide variety of zoo taxa and should, therefore, be useful for zoological managers and researchers needing to employ fecal markers in future investigations.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20853410     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nonhuman primate abnormal behavior: Etiology, assessment, and treatment.

Authors:  Corrine K Lutz; Kristine Coleman; Lydia M Hopper; Melinda A Novak; Jaine E Perlman; Ori Pomerantz
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.014

2.  Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite responses to management stressors and social change in four species of callitrichine monkeys.

Authors:  Jason D Wark; Laura Amendolagine; Kristen E Lukas; Christopher W Kuhar; Patricia M Dennis; Charles T Snowdon; Tad Schoffner; Mandi W Schook
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Linking GPS Telemetry Surveys and Scat Analyses Helps Explain Variability in Black Bear Foraging Strategies.

Authors:  Rémi Lesmerises; Lucie Rebouillat; Claude Dussault; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is summer food intake a limiting factor for boreal browsers? Diet, temperature, and reproduction as drivers of consumption in female moose.

Authors:  Rachel D Shively; John A Crouse; Dan P Thompson; Perry S Barboza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing Animal Welfare in Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Other Facilities. A Pilot Study Involving Giraffes.

Authors:  Simona Normando; Ilaria Pollastri; Daniela Florio; Linda Ferrante; Elisabetta Macchi; Valentina Isaja; Barbara de Mori
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Evaluation of Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolite Levels in Response to a Change in Social and Handling Conditions in African Lions (Panthera leo bleyenberghi).

Authors:  Paula Serres-Corral; Hugo Fernández-Bellon; Pilar Padilla-Solé; Annaïs Carbajal; Manel López-Béjar
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.