Literature DB >> 20853355

Percutaneous revascularization of long femoral artery lesions for claudication: patency over 2.5 years and impact of systematic surveillance.

Gerard Connors1, Thomas M Todoran, Brian A Engelson, Piotr S Sobieszczyk, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Scott Kinlay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty and stenting are preferred treatments for revascularizing femoral artery lesions up to 100 mm, but surgical bypass is recommended for longer lesions. We assessed long-term patency after percutaneous revascularization of long femoral artery lesions for claudication with intensive out-patient surveillance.
METHODS: We followed a cohort of 111 consecutive patients receiving angioplasty or stenting in 142 limbs in two institutions. Patients were followed for 2.5 years, and event curves and multivariable survival analysis used to compare outcomes in three groups according to lesion length (< 100 mm, 100-200 mm, and greater than 200 mm). Failed patency was defined as recurrence of symptoms with a decline in ankle brachial index, or stenosis identified by duplex ultrasound, or reintervention.
RESULTS: Compared to lesions less than 100 mm, longer lesions had higher failed primary patency (100-200 mm: HR = 2.0, P = 0.16, >200 mm: HR = 2.6, P = 0.03). Failed secondary patency was similar for short and intermediate lesions (< 5% incidence), but trended higher for lesions >200 mm (HR = 4.2, P = 0.06). An initial procedure residual stenosis greater than 20% was the only significant multivariable factor related to poorer long-term patency (HR = 15.8, P = 0.003). Compared to short lesions, the gain in long-term patency with out-patient surveillance and reintervention was higher for longer lesions and significantly so for intermediate lesions (100-200 mm = 23% versus <100 mm = 8%, P = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of long femoral artery lesions can provide acceptable long-term patency for patients with claudication when out-patient surveillance is used to identify patients who require repeat interventions. Future long-term studies should consider overall patency encompassing more than one percutaneous reintervention.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20853355     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Arun K Thukkani; Scott Kinlay
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Heather L Gornik; Coletta Barrett; Neal R Barshes; Matthew A Corriere; Douglas E Drachman; Lee A Fleisher; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Naomi M Hamburg; Scott Kinlay; Robert Lookstein; Sanjay Misra; Leila Mureebe; Jeffrey W Olin; Rajan A G Patel; Judith G Regensteiner; Andres Schanzer; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Kerry J Stewart; Diane Treat-Jacobson; M Eileen Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Management of Critical Limb Ischemia.

Authors:  Scott Kinlay
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 4.  Treatment Strategies for the Claudicant.

Authors:  Keith Pereira
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.