PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between breast density, presenting features and molecular subtype of cancer, and surgical treatment received. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Eligible patients had stage 1-3 cancer, were treated between 1/2005 and 6/2007, and had estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) measurements and films available for review. Density was classified at presentation as 1-4 using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. RESULTS: 1,323 patients were included. Significant differences across the four density groups were present in age, race, multicentricity/focality, and presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC). When density was combined into two groups, after adjustment for age, only an EIC and mammographically occult cancer were significantly more common in the dense groups. Extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS density 4) more commonly had luminal A tumors (p = 0.05), lobular cancers (p = 0.03), multicentricity (p = 0.02), and occult tumors (p < 0.0001). Greater density was associated with increased mastectomy use, with 61% of the extremely dense group having mastectomy versus 43% of those of lesser density (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cancers in extremely dense breasts occur in younger women, are more often mammographically occult, and appear to be phenotypically different from those arising in other density groups. The more common use of mastectomy may be related to these features, although density itself is not a selection criterion for mastectomy.
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between breast density, presenting features and molecular subtype of cancer, and surgical treatment received. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Eligible patients had stage 1-3 cancer, were treated between 1/2005 and 6/2007, and had estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) measurements and films available for review. Density was classified at presentation as 1-4 using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. RESULTS: 1,323 patients were included. Significant differences across the four density groups were present in age, race, multicentricity/focality, and presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC). When density was combined into two groups, after adjustment for age, only an EIC and mammographically occult cancer were significantly more common in the dense groups. Extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS density 4) more commonly had luminal A tumors (p = 0.05), lobular cancers (p = 0.03), multicentricity (p = 0.02), and occult tumors (p < 0.0001). Greater density was associated with increased mastectomy use, with 61% of the extremely dense group having mastectomy versus 43% of those of lesser density (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Cancers in extremely dense breasts occur in younger women, are more often mammographically occult, and appear to be phenotypically different from those arising in other density groups. The more common use of mastectomy may be related to these features, although density itself is not a selection criterion for mastectomy.
Authors: Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Yuan Tian; Jennifer L Guida; Hela Koka; Er-Ni Li; Bin Zhu; Hyuna Sung; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2020-10-13
Authors: L Eriksson; P Hall; K Czene; I Dos Santos Silva; V McCormack; J Bergh; J Bjohle; A Ploner Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Hilda Razzaghi; Melissa A Troester; Gretchen L Gierach; Andrew F Olshan; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Robert C Millikan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Christine Salem; David Atallah; Joelle Safi; Georges Chahine; Antoine Haddad; Nadine El Kassis; Laura-Maria Maalouly; Malak Moubarak; Mary Dib; Michel Ghossain Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-07-02 Impact factor: 3.411