Literature DB >> 20852650

Dimensions of human ejaculated spermatozoa in Papanicolaou-stained seminal and swim-up smears obtained from the Integrated Semen Analysis System (ISAS(®)).

Giuseppe Bellastella1, Trevor G Cooper, Marina Battaglia, Anda Ströse, Inma Torres, Barbara Hellenkemper, Carles Soler, Antonio A Sinisi.   

Abstract

Objective measurements are required for computer-aided sperm morphometric analysis (CASMA) machines to distinguish normal from abnormal sperm heads. The morphometric characteristics of spermatozoa in 72 samples of semen and of spermatozoa from 72 other semen samples after swim-up were quantified by the semi-automated Integrated Sperm Analysis System (ISAS) computer-aided system, which measured the sperm head parameters length (L), width (W), area (A), perimeter (P), acrosomal area (Ac), and the derived values L/W and P/A. For each man a homogeneous population of distributions characterized seminal spermatozoa (7 942 cells: median values L 4.4 μm, W 2.8 μm, A 9.8 μm(2), P 12.5 μm, Ac 47.5%, L/W 1.57, P/A 1.27), and there was no significant difference in within- and among-individual variation. Different men could have spermatozoa of significantly different dimensions. Head dimensions for swim-up spermatozoa from different men (4 812 cells) were similar to those in semen, differing only by 2%-5%. The values of L, W and L/W fell within the limits given by the World Health Organization (WHO). Although these samples were not biologically matched, linear mixed-effects statistical analyses permitted valid comparison of the groups. A subpopulation of 404 spermatozoa considered to fit the stringent criteria of WHO 'normal' seminal spermatozoa from both semen and swim-up were characterized by median values (and 95% confidence intervals) of L, 4.3 μm (3.8-4.9), W, 2.9 μm (2.6-3.3), A, 10.2 μm(2) (8.5-12.2), P, 12.4 μm (11.3-13.9), Ac, 49% (36-60), L/W, 1.49 (1.32-1.67) and P/A, 1.22 (1.11-1.35). These median values fall within the 95th centile confidence limits given by WHO, but the confidence intervals for L and W were larger. Although these differences in head dimensions among men and after swim-up could be detected by CASMA, the small differences make it unlikely that technicians would be able to distinguish them. The values could be used as default sperm head values for the CASMA machine used here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20852650      PMCID: PMC3739080          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  25 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic droplets are normal structures of human sperm but are not well preserved by routine procedures for assessing sperm morphology.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Ching-Hei Yeung; Sabina Fetic; Aligholi Sobhani; Eberhard Nieschlag
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.

Authors:  L Maree; S S du Plessis; R Menkveld; G van der Horst
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria.

Authors:  R Menkveld; F S Stander; T J Kotze; T F Kruger; J A van Zyl
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility.

Authors:  D F Katz; J W Overstreet; S J Samuels; P W Niswander; T D Bloom; E L Lewis
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug

5.  A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology.

Authors:  T F Kruger; S B Ackerman; K F Simmons; R J Swanson; S S Brugo; A A Acosta
Journal:  Arch Androl       Date:  1987

6.  Computer-assisted assessment of human sperm morphology: usefulness in predicting fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa.

Authors:  C Wang; A Leung; W L Tsoi; J Leung; V Ng; K F Lee; S Y Chan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Objective evaluation of the morphology of human epididymal sperm heads.

Authors:  C Soler; F Pérez-Sánchez; H Schulze; M Bergmann; F Oberpenning; C Yeung; T G Cooper
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2000-04

8.  Spermiometrics: objective and reproducible methods for evaluating sperm morphology.

Authors:  A Schmassmann; G Mikuz; G Bartsch; H Rohr
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida.

Authors:  R Menkveld; D R Franken; T F Kruger; S Oehninger; G D Hodgen
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 10.  Sperm preparation for ART.

Authors:  Ralf R Henkel; Wolf-Bernhard Schill
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  9 in total

1.  A collective tracking method for preliminary sperm analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Yang Wei; Hsuan-Hao Chao; Han-Ping Huang; Chang Francis Hsu; Sheng-Hsiang Li; Long Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  The application of scanning near field optical imaging to the study of human sperm morphology.

Authors:  Laura Andolfi; Elisa Trevisan; Barbara Troian; Stefano Prato; Rita Boscolo; Elena Giolo; Stefania Luppi; Monica Martinelli; Giuseppe Ricci; Marina Zweyer
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 10.435

3.  Foreword to Sperm morphometrics today and tomorrow special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.

Authors:  Carles Soler; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Multi-Target Tracking of Human Spermatozoa in Phase-Contrast Microscopy Image Sequences using a Hybrid Dynamic Bayesian Network.

Authors:  Abdollah Arasteh; Bijan Vosoughi Vahdat; Reza Salman Yazdi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Human live spermatozoa morphology assessment using digital holographic microscopy.

Authors:  Marzena Kamieniczna; Ewa Stachowska; Agata Augustynowicz; Tomasz Woźniak; Maciej K Kurpisz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men.

Authors:  Jesús L Yániz; Sandra Vicente-Fiel; Carles Soler; Pilar Recreo; Teresa Carretero; Araceli Bono; José M Berné; Pilar Santolaria
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Spermiogram and sperm head morphometry assessed by multivariate cluster analysis results during adolescence (12-18 years) and the effect of varicocele.

Authors:  Fernando Vásquez; Carles Soler; Patricia Camps; Anthony Valverde; Almudena García-Molina
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  The correlation of sperm morphology with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodan Cao; Yun Cui; Xiaoxia Zhang; Jiangtao Lou; Jun Zhou; Renxiong Wei
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-19

9.  Sperm kinematic, head morphometric and kinetic-morphometric subpopulations in the blue fox (Alopex lagopus).

Authors:  Carles Soler; Jesús Contell; Lorena Bori; María Sancho; Almudena García-Molina; Anthony Valverde; Jan Segarvall
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.