Literature DB >> 20852595

Stem cell markers (cytokeratin 15, cytokeratin 19 and p63) in in situ and invasive cutaneous epithelial lesions.

Ossama Abbas1, Joanna E Richards, Ron Yaar, Meera Mahalingam.   

Abstract

The inherent longetivity of stem cells causes them to be susceptible to multiple genetic hits. Thus, it is not surprising that stem cells are implicated in the etiopathogenesis of select cutaneous neoplasms. However, most studies to date are restricted to the use of a single marker (p63, cytokeratin-15 or cytokeratin-19) and do not appear to compare distribution of stem cell markers in a spectrum of cutaneous in situ versus invasive epithelial malignancies. In this study, we evaluate expression of cytokeratin-15, cytokeratin-19, and p63 in a series of primary cutaneous epithelial lesions that include actinic keratosis (n=29), squamous cell carcinoma in situ (n=30), bowenoid papulosis (n=15) and squamous cell carcinoma, well differentiated (n=29) in order to evaluate the role of stem cell marker expression in the grading and development of in situ and invasive malignancies. For cytokeratin-15, expression was retained in actinic keratosis (38%), squamous cell carcinoma in situ (53%) and bowenoid papulosis (60%) but appeared to be lost in squamous cell carcinoma (3%) with statistically significant differences observed between groups that retained versus those that did not (P<0.05 for all three); for cytokeratin-19, patchy yet basal expression was noted in actinic keratosis (21%), patchy and suprabasal expression was noted in squamous cell carcinoma in situ (37%), bowenoid papulosis (13%) and squamous cell carcinoma (24%) with no statistically significant differences between groups; for p63, expression was retained in actinic keratosis (90%), squamous cell carcinoma in situ (87%), bowenoid papulosis (60%) and squamous cell carcinoma (100%) with no statistically significant differences between groups. In summary, our findings expand the neoplasms which involve stem cells to include cutaneous epithelial malignancies. Differential localization of each of these markers argues in favor of stem cell heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20852595     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  10 in total

1.  Development of microfabricated dermal epidermal regenerative matrices to evaluate the role of cellular microenvironments on epidermal morphogenesis.

Authors:  Katie A Bush; George D Pins
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Working formulation of neuroendocrine tumors of the skin and breast.

Authors:  Sofia Asioli; Maria Pia Foschini; Riccardo Masetti; Vincenzo Eusebi
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Localization of human mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood and their role in repair of diabetic foot ulcers in rats.

Authors:  Qing-Song Zhao; Nan Xia; Nan Zhao; Ming Li; Chang-Long Bi; Qing Zhu; Guo-Fen Qiao; Zhi-Feng Cheng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 6.580

4.  Clinicopathological Features and Immunohistochemical Alterations of Keratinocyte Proliferation, Melanocyte Density, Smooth Muscle Hyperplasia and Nerve Fiber Distribution in Becker's Nevus.

Authors:  Ping Sheng; Yun-Long Cheng; Chuan-Chuan Cai; Wei-Jin Guo; Ying Zhou; Ge Shi; Yi-Ming Fan
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  HPV8 Field Cancerization in a Transgenic Mouse Model Is due to Lrig1+ Keratinocyte Stem Cell Expansion.

Authors:  Simone Lanfredini; Carlotta Olivero; Cinzia Borgogna; Federica Calati; Kathryn Powell; Kelli-Jo Davies; Marco De Andrea; Sarah Harries; Hiu Kwan Carolyn Tang; Herbert Pfister; Marisa Gariglio; Girish K Patel
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Analysis of KRT1, KRT10, KRT19, TP53 and MMP9 expression in pediatric and adult cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Enikő Palkó; Szilárd Póliska; István Sziklai; András Penyige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  p63 Is a Promising Marker in the Diagnosis of Unusual Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Artem Smirnov; Lucia Anemona; Flavia Novelli; Cristina M Piro; Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli; Gerry Melino; Eleonora Candi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Proglumide Reverses Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis by Interaction with the Farnesoid X Receptor and Altering the Microbiome.

Authors:  Martha D Gay; Hong Cao; Narayan Shivapurkar; Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy; Bhaskar Kallakury; Robin D Tucker; John Kwagyan; Jill P Smith
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Cutaneous Neoplasia: An Update.

Authors:  Leigh A Compton; George F Murphy; Christine G Lian
Journal:  Dermatopathology (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-08

10.  A Mouse Model of Hyperproliferative Human Epithelium Validated by Keratin Profiling Shows an Aberrant Cytoskeletal Response to Injury.

Authors:  Samal Zhussupbekova; Rohit Sinha; Paula Kuo; Paul F Lambert; Ian H Frazer; Zewen K Tuong
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 8.143

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.