Literature DB >> 20852433

Comparative study of 3 techniques to detect a relative afferent pupillary defect.

Parul Ichhpujani1, Justin E Rome, Anjana Jindal, Parul Khator, Benjamin E Leiby, Hillary Gordon, Brian Chen, George L Spaeth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the standard method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) using the Standard Swinging Flashlight Method (S-SFM) with 2 novel techniques, to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of each method, and to validate the clinical significance of detecting more subtle RAPDs by correlating the extent of glaucoma damage with the presence or absence of an RAPD as assessed by each method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, observational study 101 consecutive patients (68 diagnosed glaucoma patients, 20 glaucoma suspects including ocular hypertensives, and 13 controls) were screened for the presence or absence of an RAPD using the S-SFM, Magnifier-Assisted Swinging Flashlight Method (MA-SFM), and Ophthalmoscopic Swinging Flashlight Method . Humphrey visual field mean deviation (MD) of each eye and the intereye differences in MD and Disc damage likelihood score (DDLS) and intereye difference in DDLS were calculated. Sensitivities for each method (S-SFM, MA-SFM, and Ophthalmoscopic Swinging Flashlight Method) were calculated at increasing levels of change in DDLS and MD. Weighted κ scores were calculated for agreement between tests.
RESULTS: MA-SFM is the most sensitive method for determining an RAPD in terms of both intereye difference in DDLS and intereye differences in MD at all levels of change. Weighted κ scores revealed substantial agreement between tests for the same method, and moderate to substantial agreement among the observers.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms results of our earlier study suggesting that swinging flashlight test modified with magnification (MA-SFM) can provide a simple, inexpensive, reproducible method of detecting an RAPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20852433     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f464e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of pupil assessment for the detection of glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dolly S Chang; Li Xu; Michael V Boland; David S Friedman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Development and validation of an associative model for the detection of glaucoma using pupillography.

Authors:  Dolly S Chang; Karun S Arora; Michael V Boland; Wasu Supakontanasan; David S Friedman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Detection of asymmetric glaucomatous damage using automated pupillography, the swinging flashlight method and the magnified-assisted swinging flashlight method.

Authors:  M Waisbourd; B Lee; M H Ali; L Lu; P Martinez; B Faria; A Williams; M R Moster; L J Katz; G L Spaeth
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Symmetry of the pupillary light reflex and its relationship to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual field defect.

Authors:  Dolly S Chang; Michael V Boland; Karun S Arora; Wasu Supakontanasan; Bei Bei Chen; David S Friedman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.