Literature DB >> 20851685

Incidence of asymptomatic meatal stenosis in children following neonatal circumcision.

Marjan Joudi1, Mehdi Fathi, Mehran Hiradfar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of meatal stenosis after neonatal circumcision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male children (5-10 years old) who had been circumcised during the neonatal period and presented at our pediatric clinic for reasons other than urinary complaints were examined and interviewed regarding urination problems.
RESULTS: Of the 132 cases, 27 (20.4%) had severe meatal stenosis (diameter < 5 F). Thickening of the bladder and bilateral hydronephrosis (pyelocaliceal) were found in three cases (11.1%), and a voiding cystourethrogram was performed to reveal vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). One patient had grade II VUR in his right kidney and grade III in his left kidney; another had grade II VUR in both his kidneys.
CONCLUSION: These results highlight the importance of follow-up genital examination for all male children who have been circumcised during the neonatal period, to detect possible meatal stenosis.
Copyright © 2010 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20851685     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  10 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Minor procedure, major impact: Patient-reported outcomes following urethral meatotomy.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Tanya Logvinenko; Stuart Bauer; Bartley Cilento; Richard N Yu; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 4.  What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision?

Authors:  Matthew Deacon; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe; Morten Frisch; Peter W Adler; J Steven Svoboda
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Meatal stenosis posttraditional neonatal circumcision-cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ammar Fadil Abid; Naser Sabah Hussein
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 7.  Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision.

Authors:  Stanca Iris Iacob; Richard S Feinn; Lauren Sardi
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-11-11

8.  Evaluation of epidemiology, safety, and complications of male circumcision using conventional dissection surgery: experience at one center.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Mehdi Abedinzadeh; Mohammad Aghaali
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2011-05-11

9.  Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the "pull-and-burn" method the way to go?

Authors:  Kostis I Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

10.  Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2019-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.