Literature DB >> 20851518

Variation in quantitative sensory testing and epidermal nerve fiber density in repeated measurements.

Mona M Selim1, Gwen Wendelschafer-Crabb, James S Hodges, Donald A Simone, Shawn X Y-L Foster, Geertrui F Vanhove, William R Kennedy.   

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is commonly used to evaluate peripheral sensory function in neuropathic conditions. QST measures vary in repeated measurements of normal subjects but it is not known whether QST can reflect small changes in epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFd). This study evaluated QST measures (touch, mechanical pain, heat pain and innocuous cold sensations) for differences between genders and over time using ENFd as an objective-independent measure. QST was performed on the thighs of 36 healthy volunteers on four occasions between December and May. ENFd in skin biopsies was determined on three of those visits. Compared to men, women had a higher ENFd, a difference of 12.2 ENFs/mm. They also had lower tactile and innocuous cold thresholds, and detected mechanical pain (pinprick) at a higher frequency. Heat pain thresholds did not differ between genders. By the end of the 24-week study, men and women showed a small reduction (p<0.05) in the frequency of sharp mechanical pain evoked by pinprick whereas tactile and thermal thresholds showed no change. This coincided with a small decrease in ENFd, 4.18 ENFs/mm. Variation in measurements over time was large in a fraction of normal subjects. We conclude that most QST measures detect relatively large differences in epidermal innervation (12.2 ENFs/mm), but response to mechanical pain was the only sensory modality tested with the sensitivity to detect small changes in innervation (4.18 ENFs/mm). Since some individuals had large unsystematic variations, unexpected test results should therefore alert clinicians to test additional locations.
Copyright © 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20851518     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  14 in total

1.  Potential mechanisms for hypoalgesia induced by anti-nerve growth factor immunoglobulin are identified using autoimmune nerve growth factor deprivation.

Authors:  E M Hoffman; Z Zhang; M B Anderson; R Schechter; K E Miller
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  In vivo and in vitro comparison of female and male nociceptors.

Authors:  Jan Hendrich; Pedro Alvarez; Elizabeth K Joseph; Luiz F Ferrari; Xiaojie Chen; Jon D Levine
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 3.  Nociception at the diabetic foot, an uncharted territory.

Authors:  Ernst A Chantelau
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 4.  Uses of skin biopsy for sensory and autonomic nerve assessment.

Authors:  M Iliza Myers; Amanda C Peltier
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Ethnic differences in epidermal nerve fiber density.

Authors:  Cecilia M Shikuma; Justin C McArthur; Gigi J Ebenezer; Jintanat Ananworanich; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Tanate Jadwattanakul; Victor G Valcour; Kara Bennett; Nittaya Phanuphak
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Prediction of pain sensitivity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn; Rune Frederiksen; Anders P Skovsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Handheld mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in dairy cows - intra-individual variation, inter-observer agreement and variation over time.

Authors:  Peter M Raundal; Pia H Andersen; Nils Toft; Björn Forkman; Lene Munksgaard; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  Responsiveness of electrical nociceptive detection thresholds to capsaicin (8 %)-induced changes in nociceptive processing.

Authors:  Robert J Doll; Guido van Amerongen; Justin L Hay; Geert J Groeneveld; Peter H Veltink; Jan R Buitenweg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sex differences in thermal detection and thermal pain threshold and the thermal grill illusion: a psychophysical study in young volunteers.

Authors:  Beate Averbeck; Lena Seitz; Florian P Kolb; Dieter F Kutz
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Application of a handheld Pressure Application Measurement device for the characterisation of mechanical nociceptive thresholds in intact pig tails.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Dale A Sandercock; Emma M Malcolm; Matthew C Leach; Mette S Herskin; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.