Literature DB >> 20851229

Operative management of intrauterine device complications: a case series report.

David K Turok1, Shawn E Gurtcheff, Keri Gibson, Erin Handley, Sara Simonsen, Patricia A Murphy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the number of intrauterine device (IUD) users requiring operative intervention for device-related complications. This is an evaluation of cases requiring in-hospital operative intervention for IUD perforations, removals and pregnancy-related complications. STUDY
DESIGN: Large retrospective case series of patients who received operative management of IUD complications.
RESULTS: Charts of patients from 15 hospitals in two health care systems from 2000 to 2007 were reviewed and outcomes of 276 women are reported. There were 95 operative IUD removals for perforations (including 60 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems), 157 operative procedures for inability to remove an IUD in the office, and 42 pregnancy-related complications that were managed in the operating room. Ectopic pregnancy was the most common diagnosis among pregnant women (23 of 42 pregnant women, 54.8%).
CONCLUSION: The majority of operative procedures were performed for intrauterine IUDs, most of which were appropriately positioned IUDs with missing or short strings. In-office techniques for obtaining analgesia and dilation as well as appropriate devices for removal of T-shaped IUDs should make this practice rare.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20851229     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Delayed presentation of uterine perforation with ovary migration after dilatation and curettage.

Authors:  Shili Su; Guowei Tao; Baihua Dong; Linlin Shi; Jianchun Dong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication.

Authors:  Sujnanendra Mishra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-27

3.  IUD perforation and embedment within omentum: A rare and perplexing incidence.

Authors:  Azadeh Tarafdari; Mahrooz Malek; Elaheh Pahlevan Falahy; Alireza Hadizadeh
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Magnetic field interactions of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo study.

Authors:  Vanessa Berger-Kulemann; Henrik Einspieler; Nilouparak Hachemian; Daniela Prayer; Siegfried Trattnig; Michael Weber; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sam Rowlands; Emeka Oloto; David H Horwell
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.