Literature DB >> 20850950

EEG spectral power and negative symptoms in at-risk individuals predict transition to psychosis.

Ronan Zimmermann1, Ute Gschwandtner, Frank H Wilhelm, Marlon O Pflueger, Anita Riecher-Rössler, Peter Fuhr.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: EEG power in the delta, theta and beta1 bands has been shown to be positively correlated with negative symptoms in first episode psychotic patients. The present study investigates this correlation in an "at risk mental state for psychosis" (ARMS) with the aim to improve prediction of transition to psychosis.
METHODS: Thirteen ARMS patients with later transition to psychosis (ARMS-T) and fifteen without (follow-up period of at least 4 years) (ARMS-NT) were investigated using spectral resting EEG data (of 8 electrodes over the fronto-central scalp area placed according to the 10-20 system) and summary score of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Linear regressions were used to evaluate the correlation of SANS and EEG power in seven bands (delta, theta, alpha1, alpha2, beta1, beta2, beta3) in both ARMS groups and logistic regressions were used to predict transition to psychosis. Potentially confounding factors were controlled.
RESULTS: ARMS-T and ARMS-NT showed differential correlations of EEG power and SANS in delta, theta, and beta1 bands (p<.05): ARMS-T showed positive and ARMS-NT negative correlations. Logistic regressions showed that neither SANS score nor EEG spectral power alone predicted transition to psychosis. However, SANS score in combination with power in the delta, theta, beta1, and beta2 bands, respectively, predicted transition significantly (p<.03).
CONCLUSIONS: ARMS-T and ARMS-NT show differential correlations of SANS summary score and EEG power in delta, theta, and beta bands. Prediction of transition to psychosis is possible using combined information from a negative symptom scale and EEG spectral data.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20850950     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  14 in total

1.  Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stefanie J Schmidt; Nathalie Kaiser; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  Electroencephalography and Event-Related Potential Biomarkers in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Holly K Hamilton; Alison K Boos; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Stefan Borgwardt; Andreas Bechdolf; Jean Addington; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Matcheri Keshavan; Stephen Wood; Stephan Ruhrmann; Larry J Seidman; Lucia Valmaggia; Tyrone Cannon; Eva Velthorst; Lieuwe De Haan; Barbara Cornblatt; Ilaria Bonoldi; Max Birchwood; Thomas McGlashan; William Carpenter; Patrick McGorry; Joachim Klosterkötter; Philip McGuire; Alison Yung
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Aberrant Current Source-Density and Lagged Phase Synchronization of Neural Oscillations as Markers for Emerging Psychosis.

Authors:  Avinash Ramyead; Michael Kometer; Erich Studerus; Susan Koranyi; Sarah Ittig; Ute Gschwandtner; Peter Fuhr; Anita Riecher-Rössler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  The early identification of psychosis: can lessons be learnt from cardiac stress testing?

Authors:  Swapnil Gupta; Mohini Ranganathan; Deepak Cyril D'Souza
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Psychosis prediction: stratification of risk estimation with information-processing and premorbid functioning variables.

Authors:  Dorien H Nieman; Stephan Ruhrmann; Sara Dragt; Francesca Soen; Mirjam J van Tricht; Johannes H T M Koelman; Lo J Bour; Eva Velthorst; Hiske E Becker; Mark Weiser; Don H Linszen; Lieuwe de Haan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Persistent negative symptoms in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  D J Devoe; L Lu; T D Cannon; K S Cadenhead; B A Cornblatt; T H McGlashan; D O Perkins; L J Seidman; M T Tsuang; S W Woods; E F Walker; D H Mathalon; C E Bearden; J Addington
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Resting EEG in psychosis and at-risk populations--a possible endophenotype?

Authors:  Siri Ranlund; Judith Nottage; Madiha Shaikh; Anirban Dutt; Miguel Constante; Muriel Walshe; Mei-Hua Hall; Karl Friston; Robin Murray; Elvira Bramon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Prediction of transition from ultra-high risk to first-episode psychosis using a probabilistic model combining history, clinical assessment and fatty-acid biomarkers.

Authors:  S R Clark; B T Baune; K O Schubert; S Lavoie; S Smesny; S M Rice; M R Schäfer; F Benninger; M Feucht; C M Klier; P D McGorry; G P Amminger
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Basic disturbances of information processing in psychosis prediction.

Authors:  Mitja Bodatsch; Joachim Klosterkötter; Ralf Müller; Stephan Ruhrmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.