Literature DB >> 20849928

Perturbation-evoked electrodermal responses are sensitive to stimulus and context-dependent manipulations of task challenge.

Kathryn M Sibley1, Bimal Lakhani, George Mochizuki, William E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that postural instability evokes an electrodermal response (EDR) that is temporally coupled to perturbation onset. The purpose of this study was to determine whether arousal linked to balance recovery is associated with the size of the perturbation (stimulus-dependent variations); and/or the challenge of executing a motor response to recover stability (context-dependent task variations). Twelve healthy subjects received whole-body perturbations while seated in a tilting chair that required a compensatory upper limb reaction to regain balance following instability. The influence of perturbation amplitude (stimulus-dependent challenge- slow vs. fast perturbations) and task condition (context-dependent challenge- unrestricted vs. restricted movement) on EDR timing and magnitude parameters were examined. While EDR latency was consistent across conditions with onset occurring approximately 2s after the perturbation, peak-to-peak EDR amplitude was influenced by both stimulus-dependent and context-dependent challenges and also mirrored postural response amplitude. Compared to the Slow condition, EDR amplitude was 27 ± 6% larger in the Fast condition (p=0.0004). Similarly, EDR amplitude was 244 ± 86% larger in the Restricted task condition relative to the Unrestricted task condition (p=0.006). Context-dependent EDR modulation suggests that autonomic reactivity is associated with some higher level of processing independent of the degree of challenge related to stimulus characteristics. This work has potential implications for understanding determinants of central nervous system reactivity among individuals with impaired limb control where the recovery challenge is uniquely linked to the context.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849928     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  Effects of speed and direction of perturbation on electroencephalographic and balance responses.

Authors:  Rahul Goel; Recep A Ozdemir; Sho Nakagome; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; William H Paloski; Pranav J Parikh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  'Priming' the brain to generate rapid upper-limb reactions.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Veronica Miyasike-Dasilva; Albert H Vette; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contribution of primary motor cortex to compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; Laura Williams; W Richard Staines; William E McIlroy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.288

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of changes in reaction time based on stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Albert H Vette; Avril Mansfield; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; William E McIlroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sympathetic Response to Postural Perturbation in Stance.

Authors:  Taku Kawasaki; Hitoshi Oda; Yasushi Sawaguchi; Hiroshi Kunimura; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.