Literature DB >> 20849685

Prodromal schizophrenia in primary care: a randomised sensitisation study.

Andor E Simon1, Sabrina Jegerlehner, Thomas Müller, Katja Cattapan-Ludewig, Peter Frey, Marcus Grossenbacher, Erich Seifritz, Daniel Umbricht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GPs are often the first point of contact for patients with prodromal schizophrenia. Early intervention, and therefore early detection, of schizophrenia is pivotal for the further disease course. However, recent studies have revealed that, due to its low prevalence in general practice and its insidious features, prodromal schizophrenia often remains unnoticed. AIM: To test whether a repeated sensitisation method using clinical vignettes can improve diagnostic knowledge of GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY: Postal survey using anonymous questionnaires. Repeated sensitisation model using clinical vignettes.
SETTING: GPs in three distinct regions in Switzerland covering a general population of 1.43 million.
METHOD: The study was conducted between September 2008 and October 2009. Questionnaires were sent to 1138 GPs at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. After randomisation, 591 GPs were sensitised at 1, 3, and 5 months, while no sensitisation was carried out in the remaining 547 GPs.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 66% (750 GPs). Sensitised GPs demonstrated a highly significant increase in diagnostic knowledge at 6 and at 12 months when compared to their own baseline knowledge scores and also to non-sensitised GPs (P<0.001). In particular, awareness of insidious features, such as functional decline and social withdrawal as signs of prodromal schizophrenia, accounted for this effect.
CONCLUSION: Theoretical knowledge of prodromal schizophrenia among GPs can successfully be increased by repeated sensitisation models using clinical vignettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849685      PMCID: PMC2930245          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  27 in total

1.  Why can't GPs follow guidelines on depression? We must question the basis of the guidelines themselves.

Authors:  T Kendrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

Review 2.  Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Bernard S Bloom
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  GPs' role in the detection of psychological problems of young people: a population-based study.

Authors:  Aurélie Mauerhofer; André Berchtold; Pierre-André Michaud; Joan-Carles Suris
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states.

Authors:  T J Miller; T H McGlashan; S W Woods; K Stein; N Driesen; C M Corcoran; R Hoffman; L Davidson
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  1999

5.  General practitioners and schizophrenia: results from a Swiss survey.

Authors:  Andor E Simon; Christoph Lauber; Katja Ludewig; Hellmuth Braun-Scharm; Daniel S Umbricht
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Effectiveness of an educational strategy to improve family physicians' detection and management of depression: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G Worrall; J Angel; P Chaulk; C Clarke; M Robbins
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Training primary-care physicians to recognize, diagnose and manage depression: does it improve patient outcomes?

Authors:  B G Tiemens; J Ormel; J A Jenner; K van der Meer; T W Van Os; R H van den Brink; A Smit; W van den Brink
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Training primary care physicians improves the management of depression.

Authors:  T W van Os; J Ormel; R H van den Brink; J A Jenner; K Van der Meer; B G Tiemens; W van der Doorn; A Smit; W van den Brink
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Depression, negative symptoms, social stagnation and social decline in the early course of schizophrenia.

Authors:  H Häfner; W Löffler; K Maurer; M Hambrecht; W an der Heiden
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Understanding the topography of the early psychosis pathways. An opportunity to reduce delays in treatment.

Authors:  C Lincoln; S Harrigan; P D McGorry
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1998
View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of GPs diagnostic knowledge and treatment practice in detection and treatment of early schizophrenia: a French postal survey in Brittany.

Authors:  Mickael Le Galudec; Géraldine Cornily; Ronan Garlantézec; Florian Stéphan; Zarrin Alavi; Michel Walter
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Evaluation of the performance of general practitioners in a collaborative care program by employing simulated patients.

Authors:  Homayoun Amini; Alia Shakiba; Vandad Sharifi; Mandana Shirazi; Majid Sadeghi; Farid Abolhasani; Ahmad Hajebi
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  What is the effectiveness of printed educational materials on primary care physician knowledge, behaviour, and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Agnes Grudniewicz; Ryan Kealy; Reitze N Rodseth; Jemila Hamid; David Rudoler; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tailored intensive liaison between primary and secondary care to identify individuals at risk of a first psychotic illness (the LEGs study): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesus Perez; Huajie Jin; Debra A Russo; Jan Stochl; Michelle Painter; Gill Shelley; Erica Jackson; Carolyn Crane; Jonathan P Graffy; Tim J Croudace; Sarah Byford; Peter B Jones
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Comparison of high and low intensity contact between secondary and primary care to detect people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: study protocol for a theory-based, cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesus Perez; Debra A Russo; Jan Stochl; Sarah Byford; Jorge Zimbron; Jonathan P Graffy; Michelle Painter; Tim J Croudace; Peter B Jones
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.