Literature DB >> 20849415

MBP-1 is efficiently encoded by an alternative transcript of the ENO1 gene but post-translationally regulated by proteasome-dependent protein turnover.

Jrhau Lung1, Ko-Jiunn Liu, Jang-Yang Chang, Sy-Jye Leu, Neng-Yao Shih.   

Abstract

The c-myc promoter-binding protein-1 (MBP-1) is a transcriptional suppressor of tumorigenesis and thought to be the product of alternative translation initiation of the α-enolase (ENO1) transcript. In the present study, we cloned a 2552-bp novel cDNA with a putative coding sequence of MBP-1 and functionally examined its ability to encode the MBP-1 protein. Similarly to ENO1, the obtained MBP-1 was widely and differentially expressed in a variety of normal tissues and cancer cells. Experiments using MBP-1 promoter-driven luciferase reporter assays, biochemical cell fractionation followed by RT-PCR detection of the cytoplasmic mRNA, and transcription/translation-coupled reactions, consistently demonstrated that this novel transcript was alternatively transcribed from intron III of the ENO1 gene and was feasible for MBP-1 production. Hypoxia treatments significantly increased the transcriptional activation of the MBP-1 gene. Blocking the proteasomal degradation by MG132 stabilized the MBP-1 protein in cells. Compared with the translation efficiency for production of the MBP-1 protein, the MBP-1 transcript was 17.8 times more efficient than the ENO1 transcript. Thus, we suggest that this newly discovered transcript is a genuine template for the protein synthesis of MBP-1 in cells, and optimal expression of this gene in tumors may lead to effective clinical therapies for cancers.
© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 FEBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849415     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07819.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  14 in total

1.  Increased neuron specific enolase expression by urothelial cells exposed to or malignantly transformed by exposure to Cd²⁺ or As³⁺.

Authors:  Maureen Soh; Jane R Dunlevy; Scott H Garrett; Christina Allen; Donald A Sens; Xu Dong Zhou; Mary Ann Sens; Seema Somji
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Enolase: a key player in the metabolism and a probable virulence factor of trypanosomatid parasites-perspectives for its use as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Luisana Avilán; Melisa Gualdrón-López; Wilfredo Quiñones; Limari González-González; Véronique Hannaert; Paul A M Michels; Juan-Luis Concepción
Journal:  Enzyme Res       Date:  2011-04-07

3.  Reduction of the canonical function of a glycolytic enzyme enolase triggers immune responses that further affect metabolism and growth in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Leiyun Yang; Zhixue Wang; Aiqin Zhang; Ruchika Bhawal; Chunlong Li; Sheng Zhang; Lailiang Cheng; Jian Hua
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 12.085

4.  Activation of LANCL2 by BT-11 Ameliorates IBD by Supporting Regulatory T Cell Stability Through Immunometabolic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrew Leber; Raquel Hontecillas; Victoria Zoccoli-Rodriguez; Josep Bassaganya-Riera
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.325

5.  Arsenic, cadmium and neuron specific enolase (ENO2, γ-enolase) expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maureen A Soh; Scott H Garrett; Seema Somji; Jane R Dunlevy; Xu Dong Zhou; Mary Ann Sens; Chandra S Bathula; Christina Allen; Donald A Sens
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.722

6.  Alpha-enolase promotes cell glycolysis, growth, migration, and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer through FAK-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway.

Authors:  Qiao-Fen Fu; Yan Liu; Yue Fan; Sheng-Ni Hua; Hong-Ying Qu; Su-Wei Dong; Rui-Lei Li; Meng-Yang Zhao; Yan Zhen; Xiao-Li Yu; Yi-Yu Chen; Rong-Cheng Luo; Rong Li; Li-Bo Li; Xiao-Jie Deng; Wei-Yi Fang; Zhen Liu; Xin Song
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 17.388

7.  Alpha-enolase is upregulated on the cell surface and responds to plasminogen activation in mice expressing a ∆133p53α mimic.

Authors:  Sonal Sawhney; Kylie Hood; Alisha Shaw; Antony W Braithwaite; Richard Stubbs; Noelyn A Hung; Janice A Royds; Tania L Slatter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  In silico-based identification of human α-enolase inhibitors to block cancer cell growth metabolically.

Authors:  Jrhau Lung; Kuan-Liang Chen; Chien-Hui Hung; Chih-Cheng Chen; Ming-Szu Hung; Yu-Ching Lin; Ching-Yuan Wu; Kuan-Der Lee; Neng-Yao Shih; Ying Huang Tsai
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Experimental and bioinformatic approach to identifying antigenic epitopes in human α- and β-enolases.

Authors:  Jadwiga Pietkiewicz; Regina Danielewicz; Iwona S Bednarz-Misa; Ireneusz Ceremuga; Jerzy Wiśniewski; Magdalena Mierzchala-Pasierb; Agnieszka Bronowicka-Szydełko; Edmund Ziomek; Andrzej Gamian
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-06-17

10.  Negative transcriptional control of ERBB2 gene by MBP-1 and HDAC1: diagnostic implications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Flavia Contino; Claudia Mazzarella; Arianna Ferro; Mariavera Lo Presti; Elena Roz; Carmelo Lupo; Giovanni Perconti; Agata Giallongo; Salvatore Feo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.