Literature DB >> 20849394

Comparative evaluations of cellulosic raw materials for second generation bioethanol production.

Y J Jeon1, Z Xun, P L Rogers.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate sugar recoveries and fermentabilities of eight lignocellulosic raw materials following mild acid pretreatment and enzyme hydrolysis using a recombinant strain of Zymomonas mobilis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Dilute acid pretreatment (2% H(2) SO(4) ) with 10% (w/v) substrate loading was performed at 134°C for 60 min followed by enzyme hydrolysis at 60°C. The results demonstrated that hydrolysis of herbaceous raw materials resulted in higher sugar recoveries (up to 60-75%) than the woody sources (<50%). Fermentation studies with recombinant Z. mobilis ZM4 (pZB5) demonstrated that final ethanol concentrations and yields were also higher for the herbaceous hydrolysates. Significant reduction in growth rates and specific rates of sugar uptake and ethanol production occurred for all hydrolysates, with the greatest reductions evident for woody hydrolysates. Further studies on optimization of enzyme hydrolysis established that higher sugar recoveries were achieved at 50°C compared to 60°C following acid pretreatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the various raw materials evaluated, the highest ethanol yields and productivities were achieved with wheat straw and sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates. Sorghum straw, sugarcane tops and Arundo donax hydrolysates were similar in their characteristics, while fermentation of woody hydrolysates (oil mallee, pine and eucalyptus) resulted in relatively low ethanol concentrations and productivities. The concentrations of a range of inhibitory compounds likely to have influence the fermentation kinetics were determined in the various hydrolysates. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The study focuses on lignocellulosic materials available for second generation ethanol fermentations designed to use renewable agricultural/forestry biomass rather than food-based resources. From the results, it is evident that relatively good sugar and ethanol yields can be achieved from some herbaceous raw materials (e.g. sugarcane bagasse and sorghum straw), while much lower yields were obtained from woody biomass.
© 2010 The Authors. © 2010 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849394     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02923.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  6 in total

1.  2G ethanol from the whole sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass.

Authors:  Sandra Cerqueira Pereira; Larissa Maehara; Cristina Maria Monteiro Machado; Cristiane Sanchez Farinas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  Using global transcription machinery engineering (gTME) to improve ethanol tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  Furong Tan; Bo Wu; Lichun Dai; Han Qin; Zongxia Shui; Jingli Wang; Qili Zhu; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.328

3.  Engineered Zymomonas mobilis tolerant to acetic acid and low pH via multiplex atmospheric and room temperature plasma mutagenesis.

Authors:  Bo Wu; Han Qin; Yiwei Yang; Guowei Duan; Shihui Yang; Fengxue Xin; Chunyan Zhao; Huanhuan Shao; Yanwei Wang; Qili Zhu; Furong Tan; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Impact of hfq and sigE on the tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 to furfural and acetic acid stresses.

Authors:  Hoda Nouri; Hamid Moghimi; Sayed-Amir Marashi; Elahe Elahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fermentation performance and physiology of two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during growth in high gravity spruce hydrolysate and spent sulphite liquor.

Authors:  Emma Johansson; Charilaos Xiros; Christer Larsson
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Genome shuffling enhances stress tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis to two inhibitors.

Authors:  Weiting Wang; Bo Wu; Han Qin; Panting Liu; Yao Qin; Guowei Duan; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.040

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.