BACKGROUND: To date no adherence survey has been validated in IBD. The aim was to administer an improved medication adherence survey to IBD patients, to validate the scale in IBD, and to compare the results to perceived adherence by the gastroenterologists. METHODS: IBD patients were given the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). To validate the scale, prescription claim information, calculated as continuous single-interval medication availability (CSA) and mean possession ratio (MPR), was correlated to the MMAS-8 scale. Nonpersistence or low adherence was defined as a CSA or MPR<0.8. Treating gastroenterologists, blinded to the instrument, then assessed adherence in these patients. RESULTS: Of 110 IBD patients in the study, MMAS-8 identified 54 patients as low adherers (LAs) to their IBD medication and 56 patients as medium or high adherers (MHAs). Eighty-five percent of LAs had nonpersistent fill rates, as per CSA, compared with 11% of MHAs. Physicians correctly classified 95% of patients who were MHAs but only 33% of LAs. Underestimation of adherence only occurred in 5% of patients, whereas overestimation occurred in 67% (P<0.0001). In a linear regression analysis, CSA was significantly correlated with disease activity score (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LAs are a challenge to identify. This study demonstrates that the MMAS-8 scale is a valid instrument for assessing medication adherence in IBD. This is the first adherence scale to be validated in IBD.
BACKGROUND: To date no adherence survey has been validated in IBD. The aim was to administer an improved medication adherence survey to IBD patients, to validate the scale in IBD, and to compare the results to perceived adherence by the gastroenterologists. METHODS: IBD patients were given the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). To validate the scale, prescription claim information, calculated as continuous single-interval medication availability (CSA) and mean possession ratio (MPR), was correlated to the MMAS-8 scale. Nonpersistence or low adherence was defined as a CSA or MPR<0.8. Treating gastroenterologists, blinded to the instrument, then assessed adherence in these patients. RESULTS: Of 110 IBD patients in the study, MMAS-8 identified 54 patients as low adherers (LAs) to their IBD medication and 56 patients as medium or high adherers (MHAs). Eighty-five percent of LAs had nonpersistent fill rates, as per CSA, compared with 11% of MHAs. Physicians correctly classified 95% of patients who were MHAs but only 33% of LAs. Underestimation of adherence only occurred in 5% of patients, whereas overestimation occurred in 67% (P<0.0001). In a linear regression analysis, CSA was significantly correlated with disease activity score (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:LAs are a challenge to identify. This study demonstrates that the MMAS-8 scale is a valid instrument for assessing medication adherence in IBD. This is the first adherence scale to be validated in IBD.
Authors: B M Pernell; Michael R DeBaun; Kathleen Becker; Mark Rodeghier; Valencia Bryant; Robert M Cronin Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Cozumel S Pruette; Shayna S Coburn; Cyd K Eaton; Tammy M Brady; Shamir Tuchman; Susan Mendley; Barbara A Fivush; Michelle N Eakin; Kristin A Riekert Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Mohamed Mansor Manan; Akhma Radzuanna Husin; Ali Saleh Alkhoshaiban; Yaser Mohammed Ali Al-Worafi; Long Chiau Ming Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2014-12-05
Authors: Neal S LeLeiko; Debra Lobato; Sarah Hagin; Elizabeth McQuaid; Ronald Seifer; Sheryl J Kopel; Julie Boergers; Jack Nassau; Kristina Suorsa; Jason Shapiro; Barbara Bancroft Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Mike van der Have; Bas Oldenburg; Ad A Kaptein; Jeroen M Jansen; Robert C H Scheffer; Bas A van Tuyl; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; Marieke Pierik; Peter D Siersema; Martijn G H van Oijen; Herma H Fidder Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Tessa E H Römkens; Rene Te Morsche; Wilbert Peters; David M Burger; Frank Hoentjen; Joost P H Drenth Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kevin A Hommel; Rachel N Greenley; Michele Herzer Maddux; Wendy N Gray; Laura M Mackner Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Matthew D Egberg; Ajay S Gulati; Ziad F Gellad; Gil Y Melmed; Michael D Kappelman Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.325