BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence implicates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as an important therapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The basis for the lack of correlation between EGFR expression in the HNSCC tumor and clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors is incompletely understood. Although a variety of mechanisms likely contribute to the effectiveness of EGFR blockade, this review focuses on the biologic implications of known EGFR variations and the role of the immune system in mediating clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors. METHODS: A Medline review of articles published in the last 10 years (1999-present) on EGFR in HNSCC was performed in combination with preliminary data from our laboratories. RESULTS: Studies published to date suggest no association between the expression of EGFR on HNSCC tumors and clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors. Several mechanisms have been proposed to mediate clinical response to EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. Cumulative results from our laboratories support the role of several mechanisms, including cellular immune activation and mutated EGFR variants, in contributing to the discrepancy between level of EGFR expression and clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of EGFR targeted therapies may be mediated, at least in part, by the immune system and the presence of the truncated EGFR variant, EGFRvIII, among other factors. Criteria to identify the subset of patients likely to be responsive to EGFR targeted therapies are needed.
BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence implicates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as an important therapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The basis for the lack of correlation between EGFR expression in the HNSCC tumor and clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors is incompletely understood. Although a variety of mechanisms likely contribute to the effectiveness of EGFR blockade, this review focuses on the biologic implications of known EGFR variations and the role of the immune system in mediating clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors. METHODS: A Medline review of articles published in the last 10 years (1999-present) on EGFR in HNSCC was performed in combination with preliminary data from our laboratories. RESULTS: Studies published to date suggest no association between the expression of EGFR on HNSCC tumors and clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors. Several mechanisms have been proposed to mediate clinical response to EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. Cumulative results from our laboratories support the role of several mechanisms, including cellular immune activation and mutated EGFR variants, in contributing to the discrepancy between level of EGFR expression and clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of EGFR targeted therapies may be mediated, at least in part, by the immune system and the presence of the truncated EGFR variant, EGFRvIII, among other factors. Criteria to identify the subset of patients likely to be responsive to EGFR targeted therapies are needed.
Authors: Kolja Freier; Stefan Joos; Christa Flechtenmacher; Frauke Devens; Axel Benner; Franz X Bosch; Peter Lichter; Christof Hofele Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S E Wheeler; S Suzuki; S M Thomas; M Sen; R J Leeman-Neill; S I Chiosea; C-T Kuan; D D Bigner; W E Gooding; S Y Lai; J R Grandis Journal: Oncogene Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Qing Zhang; Sufi M Thomas; Sichuan Xi; Thomas E Smithgall; Jill M Siegfried; Joanne Kamens; William E Gooding; Jennifer Rubin Grandis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Denis Soulieres; Neil N Senzer; Everett E Vokes; Manuel Hidalgo; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Lillian L Siu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Haizhong Feng; Giselle Y Lopez; Chung Kwon Kim; Angel Alvarez; Christopher G Duncan; Ryo Nishikawa; Motoo Nagane; An-Jey A Su; Philip E Auron; Matthew L Hedberg; Lin Wang; Jeffery J Raizer; John A Kessler; Andrew T Parsa; Wei-Qiang Gao; Sung-Hak Kim; Mutsuko Minata; Ichiro Nakano; Jennifer R Grandis; Roger E McLendon; Darell D Bigner; Hui-Kuan Lin; Frank B Furnari; Webster K Cavenee; Bo Hu; Hai Yan; Shi-Yuan Cheng Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Athanassios Argiris; Steve C Lee; Trevor Feinstein; Sufi Thomas; Barton F Branstetter; Raja Seethala; Lin Wang; William Gooding; Jennifer R Grandis; Robert L Ferris Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Matthew A Smith; Richard Hall; Kate Fisher; Scott M Haake; Farah Khalil; Matthew B Schabath; Vincent Vuaroqueaux; Heinz-Herbert Fiebig; Soner Altiok; Yian Ann Chen; Eric B Haura Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: David Vasquez-Dunddel; Fan Pan; Qi Zeng; Mikhail Gorbounov; Emilia Albesiano; Juan Fu; Richard L Blosser; Ada J Tam; Tullia Bruno; Hao Zhang; Drew Pardoll; Young Kim Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Konrad Klinghammer; James Keller; Jonathan George; Jens Hoffmann; Edward L Chan; Michael J Hayman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Boban M Erovic; Dae Kim; Clarissa Cassol; David P Goldstein; Jonathan C Irish; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.943