PURPOSE: Segmenting the cardiac ventricles in magnetic resonance (MR) images is required for cardiac function assessment. Numerous segmentation methods have been developed and applied to MR ventriculography. Quantitative validation of these segmentation methods with ground truth is needed prior to clinical use, but requires manual delineation of hundreds of images. We applied a well-established method to this problem and rigorously validated the results. METHODS: An automatic method based on active contours without edges was used for left and the right ventricle cavity segmentation. A large database of 1,920 MR images obtained from 59 patients who gave informed consent was evaluated. Two standard metrics were used for quantitative error measurement. RESULTS: Segmentation results are comparable to previously reported values in the literature. Since different points in the cardiac cycle and different slice levels were used in this study, a detailed error analysis is possible. Better performance was obtained at end diastole than at end systole, and on mid-ventricular slices than apical slices. Localization of segmentation errors were highlighted through a study of their spatial distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular segmentation based on region-driven active contours provided satisfactory results in MRI, without the use of a priori knowledge. The study of error distribution allows identification of potential improvements in algorithm performance.
PURPOSE: Segmenting the cardiac ventricles in magnetic resonance (MR) images is required for cardiac function assessment. Numerous segmentation methods have been developed and applied to MR ventriculography. Quantitative validation of these segmentation methods with ground truth is needed prior to clinical use, but requires manual delineation of hundreds of images. We applied a well-established method to this problem and rigorously validated the results. METHODS: An automatic method based on active contours without edges was used for left and the right ventricle cavity segmentation. A large database of 1,920 MR images obtained from 59 patients who gave informed consent was evaluated. Two standard metrics were used for quantitative error measurement. RESULTS: Segmentation results are comparable to previously reported values in the literature. Since different points in the cardiac cycle and different slice levels were used in this study, a detailed error analysis is possible. Better performance was obtained at end diastole than at end systole, and on mid-ventricular slices than apical slices. Localization of segmentation errors were highlighted through a study of their spatial distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular segmentation based on region-driven active contours provided satisfactory results in MRI, without the use of a priori knowledge. The study of error distribution allows identification of potential improvements in algorithm performance.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S C Mitchell; B P Lelieveldt; R J van der Geest; H G Bosch; J H Reiber; M Sonka Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Maria Lorenzo-Valdés; Gerardo I Sanchez-Ortiz; Andrew G Elkington; Raad H Mohiaddin; Daniel Rueckert Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Hans C van Assen; Mikhail G Danilouchkine; Alejandro F Frangi; Sebastián Ordás; Jos J M Westenberg; Johan H C Reiber; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Honghai Zhang; Andreas Wahle; Ryan K Johnson; Thomas D Scholz; Milan Sonka Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: A Prakosa; P Malamas; S Zhang; F Pashakhanloo; H Arevalo; D A Herzka; A Lardo; H Halperin; E McVeigh; N Trayanova; F Vadakkumpadan Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Yurun Ma; Li Wang; Yide Ma; Min Dong; Shiqiang Du; Xiaoguang Sun Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Gabriella Captur; Audrey L Karperien; Chunming Li; Filip Zemrak; Catalina Tobon-Gomez; Xuexin Gao; David A Bluemke; Perry M Elliott; Steffen E Petersen; James C Moon Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 5.364