Literature DB >> 20847997

FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples.

Reinhard Hickel1, Arnd Peschke, Martin Tyas, Ivar Mjör, Stephen Bayne, Mathilde Peters, Karl-Anton Hiller, Ross Randall, Guido Vanherle, Siegward D Heintze.   

Abstract

In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria), and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface have different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name "approximal anatomic form" as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion "esthetic anatomical form". In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib (www.e-calib.info) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations, which are presented as high quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for 8 of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: "Surface luster"; "Staining (surface, margins)"; "Color match and translucency"; "Esthetic anatomical form"; "Fracture of material and retention"; "Marginal adaptation"; "Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction"; and "Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)". Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847997     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  27 in total

1.  Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Laura Ceballos; Isabel Giráldez; Bruno Baracco; Ma Victoria Fuentes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Digital photography vs. clinical assessment of resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Cecília Vilela Vasconcelos Barros de Almeida; Karen Pintado-Palomino; João Henrique Parise Fortes; Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta; Bruna Neves de Freitas; Wilson Matsumoto; Maria Tereza Moura de Oliveira Cavalcanti; Josué Alves; Camila Tirapelli
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.

Authors:  F A Spitznagel; K J Scholz; J R Strub; K Vach; P C Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Vu Thi Kieu Diem; Martin J Tyas; Hien C Ngo; Lam Hoai Phuong; Ngo Dong Khanh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Kenneth J Anusavice
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth.

Authors:  Katharina Bücher; Isabel Metz; Vinay Pitchika; Reinhard Hickel; Jan Kühnisch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Longevity of composite restorations in patients with early childhood caries (ECC).

Authors:  Katharina Bücher; André Tautz; Reinhard Hickel; Jan Kühnisch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Merve Bayram; Beyza Ballı Akgöl; Nilüfer Üstün
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT.

Authors:  S Jacker-Guhr; G Ibarra; L S Oppermann; A-K Lührs; A Rahman; W Geurtsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.