| Literature DB >> 20847917 |
Paulo Henrique Aguiar1, Adriana Tahara, Antonio Nogueira de Almeida, Kaoru Kurisu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tentorial meningiomas represent about 5% of intracranial meningiomas. This article reviews our recent institutional series of patients with tentorial meningiomas, proposes a simplified classification and analyzes postoperative evolution, discussing the salient features in the management of these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Brain tumor; morbidity; mortality; neurosurgery; tentorial meningioma
Year: 2010 PMID: 20847917 PMCID: PMC2940096 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.66851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Neurol Int ISSN: 2152-7806
Patients data showing classification, tumor size, pre and pos operative status, results and complications: resection is shown according to Simpson’s classification; follow-up period is in months; in the surgical approach, the / symbol indicates that approaches were performed at the same time, while the + sign indicates that approaches were performed on different days; size represents the largest diameter of the lesion in centimeters
| ID | Age | Sex | TU class. | Preop hydrocephalus | Treat hydrocephalus | Resection | Follow-up (months) | Postoperative KPS | Surgical complications | Pathology | Adj. Ther. | Surg. Approach | Size (cm) | Recurrence (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | F | 6B | no | NA | II | 84 | 100 | no | benign | no | RS | 2.5 | no |
| 2 | 52 | F | 6B | no | NA | I | 30 | 100 | no | atypical | RDT | RS | 3.5 | no |
| 3 | 27 | F | 1AB | yes | EDV-VPS | I | 40 | 100 | Bleeding + small visual defect | benign | no | SOIH + ITSC/SOIH | 4.5 | no |
| 4 | 58 | F | 4B | no | NA | II | 18 | 80 | no | atypical | RDT, RSG | ITSC/SOIH | 5.5 | no |
| 5 | 24 | F | 5AB | no | NA | I | 20 | 100 | CSF fistula | benign | no | RS/ST | 4 | no |
| 6 | 56 | F | 6A | no | NA | I | 21 | 100 | no | benign | no | TT | 4.7 | no |
| 7 | 35 | F | 6B | no | NA | III | 66 | 100 | no | benign | RDT, RSG | RS | 3 | 12 |
| 8 | 39 | M | 56A | no | NA | II/II/II | 72 | 80 | CSF fistula | malignant | RDT | TT + TT + ST | 4.5 | 72 |
| 9 | 68 | F | 4B | no | NA | I | NA | Death | TS ligated, CSF fistula, TEP, death | benign | no | ITSC/SOIH | 5.5 | NA |
| 10 | 54 | M | 6A | no | NA | I | 96 | 100 | no | benign | no | ST | 4.2 | |
| 11 | 62 | M | 6A | no | NA | I | 75 | 100 | no | benign | no | ST | 5 | 60 |
| 12 | 65 | F | 6B | no | NA | I | 32 | 100 | CSF fistula | benign | no | RS | 4 | no |
| 13 | 51 | F | 3A | no | NA | I | 44 | 100 | no | benign | no | SOIH | 3.5 | no |
| 14 | 46 | F | 4B | yes | EDV-VPS | I | 41 | 80 | no | benign | no | ITSC/SOIH | 4.5 | no |
| 15 | 75 | F | 6B | no | NA | I | 47 | 100 | no | benign | no | RS | 5 | no |
| 16 | 37 | F | 3A | yes | EDV | I | 14 | 100 | no | benign | no | SOIH | 5.4 | no |
| 17 | 56 | F | 6B | no | NA | I | 55 | 100 | no | benign | no | RS | 4 | no |
| 18 | 33 | F | 5B | no | NA | II | 23 | 50 | severe brain edema | benign-NF2 | RDT | RS | 4 | no |
| 19 | 41 | M | 6AB | no | NA | II | 63 | 100 | TS ligated without deficit, CSF fistula | benign | no | RS/ST | 5 | no |
| 20 | 66 | M | 5A | yes | EDV | I | 96 | 80 | no | benign | no | SOIH | 6.5 | no |
| 21 | 62 | M | 6B | no | NA | II | 94 | 100 | no | benign | no | RS | 3.7 | no |
| 22 | 62 | F | 4AB | yes | EDV | III | 96 | 80 | hypovolemic shock, CSF fistula | benign | RDT+ RSG | ITSC + ITSC/SOIH | 6 | 90 |
| 23 | 32 | F | 2A | no | NA | II | 41 | 90 | no | benign | no | ST | 1.8 | no |
| 24 | 54 | F | 6B | no | NA | II | 72 | 100 | no | benign | no | RS | 4.2 | no |
| 25 | 32 | F | 6A | no | NA | I | 84 | 100 | no | benign | no | ST | 3 | no |
| 26 | 42 | M | 12A | no | NA | IV/I | 91 | 70 | bleeding, brain swelling, Vis, CSF fistula | benign | no | ITSC + ITSC/SOIH | 4.4 | no |
| 27 | 40 | F | 45AB | no | NA | II | 25 | 100 | TS ligated without deficit | benign | no | ITSC/SOIH | 4.6 | no |
| 28 | 36 | F | 3A | no | NA | I | 46 | 100 | no | benign | no | SOIH | 3 | no |
| 29 | 32 | F | 5A | no | NA | II | 36 | 100 | no | benign | no | TT | 3.5 | no |
| 30 | 86 | M | 6B | yes | EDV | II | 48 | 80 | no | benign | no | RS | 4.6 | NA |
Abbreviations: ID- patient identity; TU class- tumor classification by site (see text for details); Adj. Ther.- adjuvant therapy; Preop - preoperative; Treat- treatment; EVD- external ventricular drainage; VPS- ventriculoperitoneal shunt; Surg. Approach- surgical approach;
patients died due to progression of the disease;
patient died due to a condition unrelated to the disease;
the tumor recurred and the second pathology disclosed a malignant transformation; NA- not applicable; Vis- patients developed postoperative visual impairment; TS- transverse sinus; NF2- patient had neurofibromatosis type 2; RS- retrosigmoid; SOIH- suboccipital interhemispheric; ITSC- infratentorial supracerebellar; TT- transtemporal; ST- subtemporal; RSG- radiosurgery; RDT- radiotherapy.
Figure 1Schematic depiction of classification used in our series; (a) view from above the tentorium and (b) view of bone structures below the tentorium related to the tumor sites
Figure 2Tumor located at 6B removed by retrosigmoid approach; (a) preoperative MRI (b) preoperative CT scan (c) postoperative CT scan showing total macroscopic removal of the meningioma
Figure 3(a) depiction of combined approach exposing supratentorial and infratentorial compartments used to remove tumor located at the 1AB position (patient 3 in Table 1); from left to right on the first line: axial and sagittal views of tumor (b) depiction of suboccipital interhemispheric approach used to remove tumor located at the 3A position (patient 13 in Table 1); from left to right on second line: axial and sagittal views of tumor