Literature DB >> 20847692

The risk of HIV drug resistance following implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis.

David A M C van de Vijver1, Charles A B Boucher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Results of trials determining if pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs prevents transmission of HIV are expected soon. Tenofovir and emtricitabine--currently evaluated as PrEP--are popular in treatment of HIV. Drug resistance could, therefore, be critical in the use of PrEP. We review the literature regarding risks associated with drug resistance owing to PrEP. RECENT
FINDINGS: Few studies addressed the issue of drug resistance to tenofovir and/or emtricitabine. Studies in HIV-1-infected individuals followed small numbers of patients for a short time. Studies in macaques were well designed, but used SHIV, which has an attenuated course of infection. The available information suggests that the probability of emergence of drug resistance is small. Infections that occurred despite use of PrEP had reduced peak viremia, which could reduce HIV transmissibility. Mathematical modeling suggests that, although transmitted drug resistance may under some circumstances increase, the benefits of PrEP outweigh the risks associated with resistance.
SUMMARY: Tenofovir and emtricitabine are recommended in first-line treatment. The potentially limited impact of drug resistance should, therefore, be confirmed in daily practice. Surveillance of drug resistance is recommended in areas where PrEP is used. Patients that became infected despite use of PrEP should be closely monitored for virological failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847692     DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32833ff1e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis        ISSN: 0951-7375            Impact factor:   4.915


  11 in total

1.  Evolution of Massachusetts physician attitudes, knowledge, and experience regarding the use of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention.

Authors:  Jaclyn M White; Matthew J Mimiaga; Douglas S Krakower; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Risk of drug resistance among persons acquiring HIV within a randomized clinical trial of single- or dual-agent preexposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Dara A Lehman; Jared M Baeten; Connor O McCoy; Julie F Weis; Dylan Peterson; Gerald Mbara; Deborah Donnell; Katherine K Thomas; Craig W Hendrix; Mark A Marzinke; Lisa Frenkel; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; Connie Celum; Julie Overbaugh; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a review of its use in HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Translation of biomedical prevention strategies for HIV: prospects and pitfalls.

Authors:  Sten H Vermund; José A Tique; Holly M Cassell; Megan E Pask; Philip J Ciampa; Carolyn M Audet
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Impact of Pill Sharing on Drug Resistance Due to a Wide-Scale Oral Prep Intervention in Generalized Epidemics.

Authors:  Dobromir Dimitrov; Marie-Claude Boily; Benoît R Mâsse; Elizabeth R Brown
Journal:  J AIDS Clin Res       Date:  2012-07-08

6.  Limited Awareness and Low Immediate Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using an Internet Social Networking Site.

Authors:  Douglas S Krakower; Matthew J Mimiaga; Joshua G Rosenberger; David S Novak; Jennifer A Mitty; Jaclyn M White; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evolving uses of oral reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the HIV-1 epidemic: from treatment to prevention.

Authors:  Ravindra K Gupta; David A M C Van de Vijver; Sheetal Manicklal; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.602

8.  How Much Do We Know about Drug Resistance Due to PrEP Use? Analysis of Experts' Opinion and Its Influence on the Projected Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Dobromir T Dimitrov; Marie-Claude Boily; Timothy B Hallett; Jan Albert; Charles Boucher; John W Mellors; Deenan Pillay; David A M C van de Vijver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in preventing HIV-1 infections in rural Zambia: a modeling study.

Authors:  Brooke E Nichols; Charles A B Boucher; Janneke H van Dijk; Phil E Thuma; Jan L Nouwen; Rob Baltussen; Janneke van de Wijgert; Peter M A Sloot; David A M C van de Vijver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  HIV-1 drug resistance in the iPrEx preexposure prophylaxis trial.

Authors:  Teri Liegler; Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen; L Gordon Bentley; Robert Atchison; Timothy Schmidt; Jacqueline Javier; Megha Mehrotra; Christopher Eden; David V Glidden; Vanessa McMahan; Peter L Anderson; Peilin Li; Joseph K Wong; Susan Buchbinder; Juan V Guanira; Robert M Grant
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.