PURPOSE: To report a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) insertion technique using sodium hyaluronate (Healon) and describe complication rates, visual acuity, and endothelial cell counts. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 105 eyes in 91 patients undergoing DSAEK. Ninety-three eyes had Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, 11 had bullous keratopathy, and 1 had iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome. We noted pre- and postoperative visual acuity at 3 and 6 months, endothelial cell counts, and complications, including graft detachment rates. Thirty-six of 141 eyes met exclusion criteria of prior incisional corneal, glaucoma, or retinal surgery. RESULTS: Because of graft detachment, 29 of 105 eyes (28%) required a re-bubble procedure at day 1 or week 1. Five of 105 grafts (4.8%) failed. Of note, in the last 35 cases, there were no graft failures and 5 detachments (14%). Twenty-eight percent of patients were 20/40 or better preoperatively compared with 49% at 3 months and 52% at 6 months. Excluding eyes with other ocular comorbidities (34), 62% were 20/40 or better at 3 months and 72% were 20/40 or better at 6 months. Postoperative endothelial cell counts were available for 52 eyes with an average cell loss of 44% at an average of 9.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK is an effective treatment for endothelial dysfunction, but the learning curve is steep. Anterior chamber stability, graft positioning, and small incision insertion are advantages to our technique. Disadvantages include a relatively high endothelial loss and dislocation rate. Minimizing endothelial cell loss and graft dislocation continue to be important goals for successful DSAEK.
PURPOSE: To report a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) insertion technique using sodium hyaluronate (Healon) and describe complication rates, visual acuity, and endothelial cell counts. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 105 eyes in 91 patients undergoing DSAEK. Ninety-three eyes had Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, 11 had bullous keratopathy, and 1 had iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome. We noted pre- and postoperative visual acuity at 3 and 6 months, endothelial cell counts, and complications, including graft detachment rates. Thirty-six of 141 eyes met exclusion criteria of prior incisional corneal, glaucoma, or retinal surgery. RESULTS: Because of graft detachment, 29 of 105 eyes (28%) required a re-bubble procedure at day 1 or week 1. Five of 105 grafts (4.8%) failed. Of note, in the last 35 cases, there were no graft failures and 5 detachments (14%). Twenty-eight percent of patients were 20/40 or better preoperatively compared with 49% at 3 months and 52% at 6 months. Excluding eyes with other ocular comorbidities (34), 62% were 20/40 or better at 3 months and 72% were 20/40 or better at 6 months. Postoperative endothelial cell counts were available for 52 eyes with an average cell loss of 44% at an average of 9.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK is an effective treatment for endothelial dysfunction, but the learning curve is steep. Anterior chamber stability, graft positioning, and small incision insertion are advantages to our technique. Disadvantages include a relatively high endothelial loss and dislocation rate. Minimizing endothelial cell loss and graft dislocation continue to be important goals for successful DSAEK.