Literature DB >> 20847550

Surgical challenge in patients who underwent failed hypospadias repair: is it time to change?

S Perovic1, G Barbagli, R Djinovic, S Sansalone, S Vallasciani, M Lazzeri.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our purpose was to evaluate patients who underwent failed hypospadias repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 4 different groups of patients who underwent failed hypospadias repair. Group 1: patients who underwent only urethral surgery; group 2: patients who underwent only corpora cavernosa surgery; group 3: patients who underwent urethral and corpora cavernosa surgery; group 4: patients who underwent complex reconstructive surgery. Success was defined as a functional urethra without fistula, with glandular meatus and acceptable esthetic appearance of the genitalia.
RESULTS: Out of 1,176 patients, group 1 included 301 patients (25.5%), group two 60 patients (5.2%), group three 166 patients (14.1%) and group four 649 patients (55.2%). The mean follow-up was 60.4 months. Out of 1,176 cases, 1,036 (88.1%) were considered successful and 140 (11.9%) failures.
CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients (55.2%) with failed hypospadias repair, urethral reconstruction is associated with complex surgical procedures to fully resurface glands, penile shaft and genitalia.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847550     DOI: 10.1159/000319856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

Review 1.  Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Santiago Vallasciani; Gianantonio Manzoni; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico De Grazia; Marco Castagnetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Male urethral strictures and their management.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  CT virtual cystourethroscopy for complex urethral strictures: an investigative, descriptive study.

Authors:  Chao Feng; Yu-Lan Shen; Yue-Min Xu; Qiang Fu; Ying-Long Sa; Hong Xie; Xiang-Guo Lv
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Perineostomy: the last oportunity.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Regueiro Lopez; Enrique Gomez Gomez; Alberto Alonso Carrillo; Roque Cano Castineira; Maria Jose Requena Tapia
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  A novel composite two-stage urethroplasty for complex penile strictures: A multicenter experience.

Authors:  Pankaj M Joshi; Guido Barbagli; Vikram Batra; Sandesh Surana; Atef Hamouda; Salvatore Sansalone; Dimitris Costi; Massimo Lazzeri; Craig Hunter; Devang J Desai; Fabio Castiglione; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Urethral Plate Characteristics in Cases of Non-proximal Hypospadias May Not Be Associated With a Higher Risk of Complications When a Two-Stage Repair Is Applied.

Authors:  Marios Marcou; Sarah-Magdalena Bobbe; Bernd Wullich; Karin Hirsch-Koch
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  Surgical Repair of Late Complications in Patients Having Undergone Primary Hypospadias Repair during Childhood: A New Perspective.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Salvatore Sansalone; Rados Djinovic; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04-10

Review 8.  Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review.

Authors:  Alexander Springer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.