Literature DB >> 20846709

Analytical and clinical validation of a new point-of-care testing system for determination of D-Dimer in human blood.

Johannes J Sidelmann1, Jørgen Gram, Anette Larsen, Kathrine Overgaard, Jørgen Jespersen.   

Abstract

D-Dimer testing is used for exclusion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). AQT90 FLEX D-Dimer (AQT D-Dimer) is a novel time-resolved fluorescence based point-of-care test for quantification of D-Dimer in whole blood or plasma. Presently we have determined the analytical and clinical performance of AQT D-Dimer and compared it with four routine D-Dimer assays. The within-run CV of AQT D-Dimer was 3.8-7.2% and the between-run CV was 5.7- 9.7%. Excellent agreement was found between the D-Dimer concentrations recorded in citrate-, heparin- and EDTA stabilised blood. The plasma concentration of D-Dimer was determined with AQT D-Dimer, AxSYM, Biopool Auto-Dimer, STA-Liatest and Vidas New in 170 consecutive patients suspected for DVT. Phlebograms were positive in 64 patients (22 distal, 42 proximal). ROC-curves (ROC), the negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV), the sensitivity and specificity of the tests were compared. The area under ROC was comparable for all tests. NPV for all DVT was 87-88%, the sensitivity was 88-92% and the PPV was 45-55%. For proximal DVT the NPV and sensitivity were 100% for all tests, whereas the PPV was 37-48%. For distal DVT we obtained a NPV of 87-88%. The sensitivity was 64-77%, the PPV was 19-24% whereas a specificity of 32-58% was observed. The AQT D-Dimer demonstrates excellent analytical and diagnostic performance. The test is rapidly performed and the measuring range of the assay is wide. The NPV, PPV, specificity, sensitivity and AUC of AQT D-Dimer for both proximal and distal DVT are comparable to routine D-Dimer assays.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20846709     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  4 in total

1.  Point of care technology or standard laboratory service in an emergency department: is there a difference in time to action? A randomised trial.

Authors:  Christian B Mogensen; Anders Borch; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Comments on point of care D-dimer testing in the emergency department: a bioequivalence study.

Authors:  Suzanne Ekelund; Eric Heilmann
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Point of care D-dimer testing in the emergency department: a bioequivalence study.

Authors:  Shuhana Perveen; Danielle Unwin; Amith Loknath Shetty
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Shifting up cutoff value of d-dimer in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a viable option? Possible risks and benefits.

Authors:  Bennidor Raviv; Shlomo H Israelit
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.112

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.