| Literature DB >> 20846369 |
Raymond Tweheyo1, Joseph Konde-Lule, Nazarius M Tumwesigye, Juliet N Sekandi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male partner attendance of skilled Antenatal Care (ANC) is beneficial to improving maternal outcomes. This study investigated the level, perceived benefits and factors associated with male partner attendance of skilled ANC in a peri-urban community recovering from two decades of civil conflict.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20846369 PMCID: PMC2946269 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Characteristics of male respondents
| Variable | Freq N = 331 | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 15-24 | 63 | 19 |
| 25-34 | 149 | 45 |
| 35-44 | 88 | 26.6 |
| ≥45 years | 31 | 9.4 |
| None | 12 | 3.7 |
| Primary | 209 | 64.7 |
| Secondary | 78 | 24.1 |
| Tertiary | 23 | 7.1 |
| Missing data | 8 | __ |
| Semi-urban | 201 | 61.3 |
| Urban | 128 | 38.7 |
| Missing data | 3 | __ |
| ≤ 4 | 112 | 33.9 |
| > 4 | 218 | 66.1 |
| Missing data | 1 | ___ |
| Never married | 112 | 33.8 |
| Married | 201 | 60.7 |
| Living together | 17 | 5.1 |
| Missing data | 1 | __ |
| Monogamous | 273 | 83 |
| Polygamous | 56 | 17 |
| Missing data | 2 | __ |
| Protestant | 69 | 21 |
| Catholic | 222 | 67.7 |
| Other | 37 | 11.3 |
| Missing data | 3 | __ |
| Peasant farmer | 268 | 81.5 |
| Manual | 20 | 6.1 |
| Sales | 19 | 5.8 |
| Professional | 22 | 6.7 |
| Missing data | 3 | __ |
| ≤ 3 | 168 | 51.7 |
| > 3 | 157 | 48.3 |
| Missing data | 6 | __ |
aMean age 31.9, bMedian household size = 5 (IQR 4 - 8), cMedian no. of children = 3 (IQR 2 - 5).
Bivariable analysis of independent variables associated with male attendance of skilled ANC
| Independent Variable | Unadjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attended Freq, N = 331(%) | Total | PRR | (95% CI) | p-value | |
| 15 - 24 | 41(65.0) | 63 | 1 | ||
| 25 - 34 | 94(63.9) | 147 | 0.98 | (1.78 - 1.22) | 0.875 |
| 35 - 44 | 58(65.9) | 88 | 1.01 | (0.80 - 1.28) | 0.916 |
| ≥ 45 | 22(70.9) | 31 | 1.09 | (0.81 - 1.45) | 0.557 |
| ≤ Primary | 133(62.1) | 214 | 1 | ||
| ≥Secondary | 78 (76.4) | 102 | 1.25 | (1.08 - 1.46) | 0.003** |
| Semi-urban | 131(65.5) | 200 | 1 | ||
| Urban | 83(65.8) | 126 | 1.00 | (0.86 - 1.18) | 0.945 |
| ≤ 4 | 72 (64.2) | 112 | 1 | ||
| > 4 | 142 (65.7) | 216 | 1.02 | (0.86 - 1.21) | 0.795 |
| Never married | 63(56.2) | 112 | 1 | ||
| Married | 142(71.0) | 200 | 1.26 | (1.04 - 1.52) | 0.014* |
| Not married | 10(58.8) | 17 | 1.04 | (0.67 - 1.60) | 0.839 |
| Monogamous | 182 (66.9) | 272 | 1 | ||
| Polygamous | 33 (60.0) | 55 | 0.89 | (0.71 - 1.13) | 0.356 |
| Manual worker | 185(64.6) | 286 | 1 | ||
| Sales | 15 (78.9) | 19 | 1.22 | (0.95 - 1.56) | 0.115 |
| Professionala | 14 (63.6) | 22 | 0.98 | (0.70 - 1.36) | 0.922 |
| ≤ 5 KM | 178 (67.7) | 263 | 1 | ||
| > 5 KM | 37 (56.0) | 66 | 0.82 | (0.65 - 1.04) | 0.108 |
| Radio | |||||
| No | 47(22.1) | 75 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 166(77.9) | 252 | 1.05 | (0.86 - 1.27) | 0.618 |
| VHT member | |||||
| No | 136(63.8) | 218 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 77(36.2) | 109 | 1.13 | (0.96 - 1.32) | 0.126 |
| Health worker at facility | |||||
| No | 115(54.0) | 189 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 98(46.0) | 138 | 1.16 | (0.99 - 1.36) | 0.053 |
| Community campaign | |||||
| No | 183(85.9) | 263 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 30(14.1) | 64 | 0.67 | (0.51 - 0.88) | 0.005** |
| ≤ 2 services | 57(35.2) | 162 | 1 | ||
| 3-5 services | 158(95.8) | 165 | 2.72 | (2.20 - 3.36) | 0.000*** |
| ≤ 1 year | 38 (80.9) | 47 | 1 | ||
| | 177 (62.8) | 282 | 0.77 | (0.65 - 0.91) | 0.003** |
| No | 28 (48.3) | 58 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 187 (69.0) | 271 | 1.42 | (1.08 - 1.88) | 0.012* |
| No | 35 (76.1) | 46 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 177 (63.7) | 276 | 0.83 | (0.69 - 1.00) | 0.059 |
| No | 09(4.3) | 20 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 199(95.7) | 295 | 1.43 | (0.99 - 2.06) | 0.054 |
| No | 131(62.4) | 209 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 79(37.6) | 107 | 1.20 | (1.03-1.40) | 0.018* |
| No | 145(70.4) | 199 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 61(29.6) | 102 | 0.88 | (0.73 - 1.05) | 0.176 |
*Statistically significant at p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 aProfessional occupation includes teacher, health worker and engineer
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with male attendance of skilled ANC
| OUTCOME: Male Attendance of skilled ANC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq, N = 331(%) | ||||
| 15 - 24 | 41(65.0) | 63 | 1 | 1 |
| 25 - 34 | 94(63.9) | 147 | 0.98 (1.78 - 1.22) | 0.91 (0.75 - 1.11) |
| 35 - 44 | 58(65.9) | 88 | 1.01 (0.80 - 1.28) | 0.93 (0.75 - 1.17) |
| ≥ 45 | 22(70.9) | 31 | 1.09 (0.81 - 1.45) | 0.84 (0.66 - 1.08) |
| Never married | 63(56.2) | 112 | 1 | 1 |
| Married | 142(71.0) | 200 | 1.26 (1.04 - 1.52)* | 1.11 (0.95 - 1.30) |
| Not married | 10(58.8) | 17 | 1.04 (0.67 - 1.60) | 0.98 (0.75 - 1.30) |
| Monogamous | 182 (66.9) | 272 | 1 | 1 |
| Polygamous | 33 (60.0) | 55 | 0.89 (0.71 - 1.13) | 0.86 (0.74 - 1.00) |
| ≤ 5 KM | 178 (67.7) | 263 | 1 | 1 |
| > 5 KM | 37 (56.0) | 66 | 0.82 (0.65 - 1.04) | 0.83 (0.70 - 0.98)* |
| ≤ 2 services | 57(35.2) | 162 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥3 services | 158(95.8) | 165 | 2.72 (2.20 - 3.36)*** | 2.77 (2.24-3.42)*** |
| No | 35 (76.1) | 46 | 1 | |
| Yes | 177 (63.7) | 276 | 0.83 (0.69 - 1.00) | 0.83 (0.71-0.97)* |
| No | 115(54.0) | 189 | 1 | |
| Yes | 98(46.0) | 138 | 1.16 (0.99 - 1.36) | 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29)* |
| No | 28 (48.3) | 58 | 1 | |
| Yes | 187 (69.0) | 271 | 1.42 (1.08 - 1.88)* | 1.31 (1.04-1.64)* |
log likelihood = - 270.43
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001