Literature DB >> 20845983

Adsorption mechanism and uptake of methane in covalent organic frameworks: theory and experiment.

Joseé L Mendoza-Cortés1, Sang Soo Han, Hiroyasu Furukawa, Omar M Yaghi, William A Goddard.   

Abstract

We determined the methane (CH(4)) uptake (at 298 K and 1 to 100 bar pressure) for a variety of covalent organic frameworks (COFs), including both two-dimensional (COF-1, COF-5, COF-6, COF-8, and COF-10) and three-dimensional (COF-102, COF-103, COF-105, and COF-108) systems. For all COFs, the CH(4) uptake was predicted from grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations based on force fields (FF) developed to fit accurate quantum mechanics (QM) [second order Møller-Plesset (MP2) perturbation theory using doubly polarized quadruple-ζ (QZVPP) basis sets]. This FF was validated by comparison with the equation of state for CH(4) and by comparison with the experimental uptake isotherms at 298 K (reported here for COF-5 and COF-8), which agrees well (within 2% for 1-100 bar) with the GCMC simulations. From our simulations we have been able to observe, for the first time, multilayer formation coexisting with a pore filling mechanism. The best COF in terms of total volume of CH(4) per unit volume COF absorbent is COF-1, which can store 195 v/v at 298 K and 30 bar, exceeding the U.S. Department of Energy target for CH(4) storage of 180 v/v at 298 K and 35 bar. The best COFs on a delivery amount basis (volume adsorbed from 5 to 100 bar) are COF-102 and COF-103 with values of 230 and 234 v(STP: 298 K, 1.01 bar)/v, respectively, making these promising materials for practical methane storage.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20845983     DOI: 10.1021/jp1044139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  9 in total

1.  Stability and electronic properties of 3D covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Binit Lukose; Agnieszka Kuc; Thomas Heine
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Modeling the selectivity of indoor pollution gases over N2 on covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Wenliang Li; Yujia Pang; Jingping Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  Covalent organic frameworks as multifunctional materials for chemical detection.

Authors:  Zheng Meng; Katherine A Mirica
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 60.615

4.  Synthesis of chemically stable covalent organic frameworks in water.

Authors:  Samantha Yu-Ling Chong
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.769

5.  Amine-Functionalized Covalent Organic Framework for Efficient SO2 Capture with High Reversibility.

Authors:  Gang-Young Lee; Joohyeon Lee; Huyen Thanh Vo; Sangwon Kim; Hyunjoo Lee; Taiho Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Design of Zeolite-Covalent Organic Frameworks for Methane Storage.

Authors:  Ha Huu Do; Soo Young Kim; Quyet Van Le; Nguyen-Nguyen Pham-Tran
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Direct synthesis of covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs) through aromatic nucleophilic substitution reactions.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Wen-Qian Li; Wei-Bo Hu; Wen-Jing Hu; Yahu A Liu; Hui Yang; Ke Wen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Fe-doped H3PMo12O40 immobilized on covalent organic frameworks (Fe/PMA@COFs): a heterogeneous catalyst for the epoxidation of cyclooctene with H2O2.

Authors:  Dandan Yu; Wenxiu Gao; Shuyu Xing; Lili Lian; Hao Zhang; Xiyue Wang; Dawei Lou
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Mesoporous 2D covalent organic frameworks based on shape-persistent arylene-ethynylene macrocycles.

Authors:  Haishen Yang; Ya Du; Shun Wan; George Devon Trahan; Yinghua Jin; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 9.825

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.