Literature DB >> 20845502

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: where are we going?

Susan H Whang, Klaus Thaler.   

Abstract

The foundation for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is to access the peritoneal and other body cavities through the wall of the alimentary tract via natural orifices, with the goal of performing procedures within the peritoneum and other cavities, without the need to make incisions in the abdominal wall. We have made great progress in the field of NOTES since the publication of the White Paper in 2006. There are still major fundamental goals as outlined by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy joint committee that need to be evaluated and answered before NOTES is ready for widespread clinical use. These include prevention of infection, instrument development, creation of a multitasking platform, and the ability to recognize and treat intraperitoneal complications such as hemorrhage and other physiological adverse events. In response to this need, recent abstracts and papers have focused on the management of intraoperative complications. The next phase is to focus on controlled prospective multicenter clinical trials that compare defined NOTES procedure to standard laparoscopy. The goal is to produce reliable and convincing data for the United States Food and Drug Administration, insurance companies, the physician community and the general public. At the present time, we still have many important milestones that still need to be met. Most investigators agree that a hybrid technique and not a pure NOTES practice should be advocated until devices can meet the current and new challenges in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20845502      PMCID: PMC2941058          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i35.4371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  7 in total

1.  Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthias Federlein; Dietmar Borchert; Verena Müller; Yüksel Atas; Frauke Fritze; Jens Burghardt; Dirk Elling; Klaus Gellert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  [Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery].

Authors:  R P Voermans; M I van Berge Henegouwen; W A Bemelman; P Fockens
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2008-05-10

4.  [Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a retrospective case-control study].

Authors:  M Hensel; U Schernikau; A Schmidt; G Arlt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 0.942

Review 5.  NOTES: human experience.

Authors:  G V Rao; D Nageshwar Reddy; Rupa Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2008-04

6.  A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intra-abdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model.

Authors:  Per-Ola Park; Gary L Long; Maria Bergström; Christie Cunningham; Omar J Vakharia; Gregory J Bakos; Kurt R Bally; Richard I Rothstein; C Paul Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application.

Authors:  R Zorron; L C Maggioni; L Pombo; A L Oliveira; G L Carvalho; M Filgueiras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Improvements in robotic natural orifice surgery with a novel material handling system.

Authors:  Jeff Midday; Carl A Nelson; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stephen Kin Yong Chang; Yi Liang Wang; Liang Shen; Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer; Krishnakumar Madhavan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Si Yu; Yong Ji; Tedong Luo; Pengjie Xu; Zuojun Zhen; Jianzhong Deng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.