Literature DB >> 20845089

Formulation development of morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets and its bioequivalence study in healthy Thai volunteers.

Detpon Preechagoon1, Viroj Sumyai, Suvatna Chulavatnatol, Poj Kulvanich, Thanee Tessiri, Khanittha Tontisirin, Thaned Pongjanyakul, Verawan Uchaipichat, Sirikul Aumpon, Chaiyasit Wongvipaporn.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to develop morphine sulfate sustained-release tablet formulations and to evaluate the bioequivalence compared with a commercial brand. The physicochemical properties of the formulated and commercial tablets were determined and compared. The bioequivalence investigation was carried out in 15 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose in a randomized two-way crossover design. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h. Morphine concentration was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detector. The log-transformed C(max) and AUC(s) were statistically compared by analysis of variance, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratio of the log-transformed C(max) and AUC(s) between the most promising developed formulation and the commercial product were determined. It was found that the dissolution rate profile of a developed formulation was similar to the commercial brand. Their similarity and difference factors were well within limits. In the bioequivalence study, the AUC(last) and AUC(inf) between the test and the reference products were not statistically different (p = 0.227 and p = 0.468, respectively), with the 90% CIs of 83.4-102.6% and 87.7-139.4%, respectively. However, the C(max) of the two formulations was significantly different (p = 0.019). The 90% CI of the developed formulation was 72.0-93.0% compared to the commercial product. In vitro dissolution of locally prepared morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets was comparable to commercial brand. However, the results justified the conclusion of lack of bioequivalence of the developed product to the commercial one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20845089      PMCID: PMC2974156          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-010-9518-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  14 in total

Review 1.  Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles.

Authors:  P Costa; J M Sousa Lobo
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronide metabolites by two-step solid-phase extraction.

Authors:  Q C Meng; M S Cepeda; T Kramer; H Zou; D J Matoka; J Farrar
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  2000-05-26

3.  MECHANISM OF SUSTAINED-ACTION MEDICATION. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF RATE OF RELEASE OF SOLID DRUGS DISPERSED IN SOLID MATRICES.

Authors:  T HIGUCHI
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  A controlled study of sustained-release morphine sulfate tablets in chronic pain from advanced cancer.

Authors:  T D Walsh; N MacDonald; E Bruera; K V Shepard; M Michaud; R Zanes
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 5.  Peak plasma concentrations after oral morphine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S L Collins; C C Faura; R A Moore; H J McQuay
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Steady-state pharmacokinetic comparison of a new, extended-release, once-daily morphine formulation, Avinza, and a twice-daily controlled-release morphine formulation in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain.

Authors:  Russell K Portenoy; Andréa Sciberras; Lise Eliot; Gordon Loewen; Jackie Butler; John Devane
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of twenty-four-hourly Kapanol compared to twelve-hourly MS Contin in the treatment of severe cancer pain.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Gourlay; David A Cherry; Margaret M Onley; Simon G Tordoff; David A Conn; Gillian M Hood; John L Plummer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Effect of food on the comparative pharmacokinetics of modified-release morphine tablet formulations, Oramorph SR and MST Continus.

Authors:  A J Miller; K J Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Analgesic efficacy and potency of two oral controlled-release morphine preparations.

Authors:  S S Bloomfield; G B Cissell; J Mitchell; T P Barden; R F Kaiko; R D Fitzmartin; R P Grandy; J Komorowski; P D Goldenheim
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Study of the bioequivalence of two controlled-release formulations of morphine.

Authors:  P Bourget; A Lesne-Hulin; V Quinquis-Desmaris
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.366

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mesoporous Polydopamine Nanoparticles Attenuate Morphine Tolerance in Neuropathic Pain Rats by Inhibition of Oxidative Stress and Restoration of the Endogenous Antioxidant System.

Authors:  Yaswanth Kuthati; Prabhakar Busa; Srikrishna Tummala; Vaikar Navakanth Rao; Venkata Naga Goutham Davuluri; Yen-Peng Ho; Chih-Shung Wong
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

2.  In silico (computed) modelling of doses and dosing regimens associated with morphine levels above international legal driving limits.

Authors:  Jason W Boland; Miriam Johnson; Diana Ferreira; David J Berry
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.762

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.