Literature DB >> 20844884

Abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: perioperative morbidity.

Melike Doğanay1, Yasemin Yildiz, Esra Tonguc, Turgut Var, Rana Karayalcin, Ozlem Gun Eryılmaz, Orhan Aksakal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of our retrospective study was to assess and to compare the surgical complications of hysterectomy regarding the choice of procedure [abdominal (AH), vaginal (VH), and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)].
METHODS: A total of 6,480 patient charts undergone hysterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Data including transfusion, bladder, ureteral and bowel injury, cuff dehiscence, pulmoner embolus, febrile morbidity, hematoma, reoperation, pelvic wall problems were gathered. The Chi-square test and Student's t test were used in the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The most common perioperative complication was blood transfusion which occurred in 114 patients (2.6%). VH patients required significantly less blood transfusion than AH (2.1, 2.6%, respectively). AH had significantly more bladder injury than VH (0.7, 0.4%, respectively). AH had significantly more ureteral injury than VH (0.2, 0.1%, respectively). AH had the same bowel injury as VH (0.1%). AH and VH necessitated significantly more reoperation than TLH (0.4, 0.2, 0.0%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: To our study, VH ensures less complication rates than AH. In experienced centers, VH can be a reliable alternative to AH. Controlled prospective studies with large patient volumes are required to compare TLH and VH according to complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844884     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1678-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasonic thermal damage during robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jason Massengill; Eric Lombardini; Jonathan Oliva; Jerome Buller; Daniel Gruber
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

2.  Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey.

Authors:  Z O Inal; H A Inal
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Which one is safer - performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy with a tissue fusion device involving diagnostic cystoscopy or traditional abdominal hysterectomy with ureteral dissection?

Authors:  Ali Yavuzcan; Gazi Yildiz; Mete Cağlar; Raşit Altıntaş; Serdar Dilbaz; Pinar Yildiz; Selahattin Kumru; Yusuf Ustün
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.