Literature DB >> 20844438

Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with common outcomes: a Bayesian approach.

Haitao Chu1, Stephen R Cole.   

Abstract

In cohort studies with common outcomes, the odds ratio estimated from a logistic regression analysis is often interpreted as an indirect estimate of the risk ratio. In such settings, the odds ratio will be farther from the null than the risk ratio. Direct and unbiased estimates of the risk ratio may be obtained from a log binomial model fit by maximum likelihood. When the maximum likelihood log binomial model fails to converge (as is common) or provides predicted probability estimates or upper confidence limits greater than 1.0, various approaches have been suggested, but each has drawbacks, as we describe. We propose a novel Bayesian approach for the estimation of the risk ratio from the log binomial model that addresses drawbacks of existing approaches. Posterior computation can be accomplished easily using the WinBUGs code provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844438     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f2012b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  15 in total

1.  Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with a common outcome: a simple and efficient two-stage approach.

Authors:  Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Andreas Stang; Charles Poole
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Estimating the Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction in Clustered-Data Settings.

Authors:  Katharine Correia; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists.

Authors:  Ghassan Hamra; Richard MacLehose; David Richardson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Accounting for misclassified outcomes in binary regression models using multiple imputation with internal validation data.

Authors:  Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Melissa A Troester; David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Preschool motor skills following physical and occupational therapy services among non-disabled very low birth weight children.

Authors:  Stephanie Watkins; Michele Jonsson-Funk; M Alan Brookhart; Steven A Rosenberg; T Michael O'Shea; Julie Daniels
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

7.  A Bayesian approach to estimating causal vaccine effects on binary post-infection outcomes.

Authors:  Jincheng Zhou; Haitao Chu; Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data.

Authors:  BaoLuo Sun; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio "portable" in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model.

Authors:  Mengli Xiao; Yong Chen; Stephen R Cole; Richard F MacLehose; David B Richardson; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Bayesian models as a unified approach to estimate relative risk (or prevalence ratio) in binary and polytomous outcomes.

Authors:  Vanessa Bielefeldt Leotti Torman; Suzi Alves Camey
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.