Literature DB >> 20844180

Determination of correct implant size in radial head arthroplasty to avoid overlengthening: surgical technique.

George S Athwal1, Simon G Frank, Ruby Grewal, Kenneth J Faber, James Johnson, Graham J W King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a radial head implant that results in radial overlengthening has been associated with altered elbow kinematics, increased radiocapitellar joint forces, capitellar erosions, early-onset arthritis, and loss of elbow flexion. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and radiographic features that may be used to diagnose overlengthening of the radius intraoperatively and on postoperative radiographs.
METHODS: Radial head implants of varying thicknesses were inserted into seven cadaver specimens, which were then assessed clinically and radiographically. Eight stages were examined: the intact specimen (stage 1); repair of the lateral collateral ligament (stage 2); radial head resection with repair of the lateral collateral ligament (stage 3); insertion of an implant of the correct thickness (stage 4); and insertion of an implant that resulted in radial overlengthening of 2 mm (stage 5), 4 mm (stage 6), 6 mm (stage 7), or 8 mm (stage 8). The specimens were tested with and without muscle loading to simulate resting muscle tone and surgical paralysis, respectively. At each stage, radiographs were made to measure the ulnohumeral joint space and the lateral ulnohumeral joint was visually assessed.
RESULTS: We identified no difference, with regard to medial ulnohumeral joint incongruity as seen radiographically, among stages 1 through 6 during the tests with muscle loading. A significant difference in medial ulnohumeral joint incongruity was found in stages 7 (p = 0.003) and 8 (p < 0.001). The clinical (visually assessed) lateral ulnohumeral joint space gap was negligible in stages 1 through 4 but increased significantly at all stages involving overlengthening (gross gap, 0.9 mm with 2 mm of erlengthening [p = 0.005], 2.3 mm with 4 mm of overlengthening [p < 0.001], 3.4 mm with 6 mm [p < 0.001], and 4.7 mm with 8 mm [p < 0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: Incongruity of the medial ulnohumeral joint becomes apparent radiographically only after overlengthening of the radius by ≥6 mm. Intraoperative visualization of a gap in the lateral ulnohumeral joint is a reliable indicator of overlengthening following the insertion of a radial head prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844180     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Jun Duan; Fengsheng Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01-21

2.  Can ulnar variance be used to detect overstuffing after radial head arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Jin-Ho Hong; Nitin Bither; Won-Yong Shon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Primary radial head arthroplasty in trauma : Complications].

Authors:  K Schmidt-Horlohé; S Buschbeck; D Wincheringer; M Weißenberger; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Radial head reconstruction in elbow fracture-dislocation: monopolar or bipolar prosthesis?

Authors:  Robert U Hartzler; Bernard F Morrey; Scott P Steinmann; Manuel Llusa-Perez; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tight-fitting radial head prosthesis: does stem size help prevent painful loosening?

Authors:  Pierre Laumonerie; Nicolas Reina; Claudia Gutierrez; Stephanie Delclaux; Meagan E Tibbo; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Radial head arthropolasty in unreconstructable comminuted fractures of the radial head: Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome].

Authors:  Ulf-Wilhelm Bökeler; Felix Kraft; Robert Schappacher; Verena Weisenberger; Anna Herlan; Ulrich C Liener
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Francesco Luceri; Andrea Celli; Alessandra Menon; Raul Barco; Kilian Wegmann; Pietro Randelli; Denise Eygendaal; Paolo Arrigoni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Radial head prosthesis in complex elbow dislocations: effect of oversizing and comparison with ORIF.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Moritz Deuss; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Benedict Swartman; Matthias Muenzberg; Paul-Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of Radial Head Fractures with a Modular Metallic Radial Head Replacement.

Authors:  Robert Longstaffe; Graham J W King; Jonathan P Marsh
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-03-08

10.  Radial head prosthesis: results overview.

Authors:  E Carità; A Donadelli; L Cugola; P Perazzini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.