Literature DB >> 20843545

Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection.

Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck1, Wendy Ducat.   

Abstract

Capturing the multiple aspects of the romantic peer context is a significant challenge for research. One often recommended option is to use reports of multiple relationship features from both members of the romantic dyad. Using a new measure, we extended an existing model of dyadic perception (Kenny & Acitelli, 2001) to investigate associations between couples' (N = 148) reports about the positive and negative dimensions of their romantic relationships. Differences by participant age and relationship length were examined to test developmental hypotheses, and attachment and well-being were examined as correlates of participants' romantic perceptions. Agreement between partners was low, but associations of individuals' reports about themselves and their partners were high (projection). Agreement about negative romantic behaviors was higher in older compared to younger individuals and agreement about positive behaviors was higher in longer compared to shorter relationships. Partner similarity in negative behavior was higher than similarity in positive behavior. Individuals with better well-being reported more positive romantic behaviors, and attachment security was associated in some cases. Males were more negative about romantic behaviors than females, but there was no gender difference in agreement or projection.
Copyright © 2010 The Association for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20843545     DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc        ISSN: 0140-1971


  5 in total

1.  Concordance in Reported Love, Trust, and Relationship Quality among Same-Sex Male Relationships.

Authors:  Anna Bratcher; Erin Kahle; Patrick Sullivan; Marco A Hidalgo; Matthew J Mimiaga; Rob Garofalo; Dana Pardee; Samuel Hoehnle; Jennie Thai; Ruth Dana; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  J Relatsh Res       Date:  2019-01-15

2.  Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length.

Authors:  Ann Lantagne; Wyndol Furman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  Predicting romantic involvement, relationship cognitions, and relationship qualities from physical appearance, perceived norms, and relational styles regarding friends and parents.

Authors:  Wyndol Furman; Jessica K Winkles
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2010-08-30

4.  Adult Attachment and Transgender Identity in the Italian Context: Clinical Implications and Suggestions for Further Research.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Amodeo; Roberto Vitelli; Cristiano Scandurra; Simona Picariello; Paolo Valerio
Journal:  Int J Transgend       Date:  2015

5.  Well-Being and Romantic Relationships: A Systematic Review in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Mercedes Gómez-López; Carmen Viejo; Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.