Literature DB >> 20843174

From cell population models to tumor control probability: including cell cycle effects.

Thomas Hillen1, Gerda de Vries, Jiafen Gong, Chris Finlay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classical expressions for the tumor control probability (TCP) are based on models for the survival fraction of cancer cells after radiation treatment. We focus on the derivation of expressions for TCP from dynamic cell population models. In particular, we derive a TCP formula for a generalized cell population model that includes the cell cycle by considering a compartment of actively proliferating cells and a compartment of quiescent cells, with the quiescent cells being less sensitive to radiation than the actively proliferating cells.
METHODS: We generalize previously derived TCP formulas of Zaider and Minerbo and of Dawson and Hillen to derive a TCP formula from our cell population model. We then use six prostate cancer treatment protocols as a case study to show how our TCP formula works and how the cell cycle affects the tumor treatment.
RESULTS: The TCP formulas of Zaider-Minerbo and of Dawson-Hillen are special cases of the TCP formula presented here. The former one represents the case with no quiescent cells while the latter one assumes that all newly born cells enter a quiescent cell phase before becoming active. From our case study, we observe that inclusion of the cell cycle lowers the TCP.
CONCLUSION: The cell cycle can be understood as the sequestration of cells in the quiescent compartment, where they are less sensitive to radiation. We suggest that our model can be used in combination with synchronization methods to optimize treatment timing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20843174     DOI: 10.3109/02841861003631487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Mathematical model for the thermal enhancement of radiation response: thermodynamic approach.

Authors:  Adriana M De Mendoza; Soňa Michlíková; Johann Berger; Jens Karschau; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart; Damian D McLeod
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Stochastic model for tumor control probability: effects of cell cycle and (a)symmetric proliferation.

Authors:  Andrew Dhawan; Kamran Kaveh; Mohammad Kohandel; Sivabal Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 3.  Mathematical and computational modeling in biology at multiple scales.

Authors:  Jack A Tuszynski; Philip Winter; Diana White; Chih-Yuan Tseng; Kamlesh K Sahu; Francesco Gentile; Ivana Spasevska; Sara Ibrahim Omar; Niloofar Nayebi; Cassandra Dm Churchill; Mariusz Klobukowski; Rabab M Abou El-Magd
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 2.432

4.  A Multi-stage Representation of Cell Proliferation as a Markov Process.

Authors:  Christian A Yates; Matthew J Ford; Richard L Mort
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Towards predicting the response of a solid tumour to chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments: clinical insights from a computational model.

Authors:  Gibin G Powathil; Douglas J A Adamson; Mark A J Chaplain
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  In silico analysis of cell cycle synchronisation effects in radiotherapy of tumour spheroids.

Authors:  Harald Kempf; Haralampos Hatzikirou; Marcus Bleicher; Michael Meyer-Hermann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Optimal treatment and stochastic modeling of heterogeneous tumors.

Authors:  Hamidreza Badri; Kevin Leder
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.540

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.