Literature DB >> 20842536

Raising suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: detecting misconduct.

Michael R Hamrell1.   

Abstract

The clinical Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) oversight program of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assesses the quality and integrity of data submitted to the FDA for new product approvals and human subjects protection during clinical studies. A comprehensive program of on-site inspections and data verification, the BIMO program routinely performs random inspections to verify studies submitted to the FDA to support a marketing application. On occasion the FDA will conduct a directed inspection of a specific site or study to look for problems that may have previously been identified. The inspection of a clinical study sometimes uncovers evidence of research fraud or misconduct and it must be decided how to deal with the investigator and the suspect data. The prevention of [or] decreasing the incidence of fraud and misconduct through monitoring by the sponsor is one way to manage compliance issues and can help prevent misconduct. A training program is another way to manage compliance issues in clinical research. While training does not guarantee quality, it does help to ensure that all individuals involved understand the rules and the consequences of research misconduct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842536     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9232-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Drug makers relied on clinical researchers who now await trial.

Authors:  Steve Stecklow; Laura Johannes
Journal:  Wall St J (East Ed)       Date:  1997-08-15

2.  A doctor's drug studies turn into fraud.

Authors:  Kurt Eichenwald; Gina Kolata
Journal:  N Y Times Web       Date:  1999-05-17

3.  Ethics and clinical research.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Clinical study reflections: another view: Commentary on: "Raising suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: detecting misconduct".

Authors:  Patricia Spitzig
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Editors' overview: topics in the responsible management of research data.

Authors:  Joe Giffels; Sara H Vollmer; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08-04

4.  Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency.

Authors:  Jaime Arango; Tina Chuck; Susan S Ellenberg; Bridget Foltz; Colleen Gorman; Heidi Hinrichs; Susan McHale; Kunal Merchant; Jonathan Seltzer; Stephanie Shapley; Gretchen Wild
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.