PURPOSE: Develop a preclinical in vitro algorithm enabling de novo design of semisolid vaginal drug delivery gels, by using biomechanical modeling of gel spreading in the vaginal canal and empirically relating gel composition to mechanical properties and predicted performance. METHODS: Gel performance was defined through a multivariate objective function constructed from gels' mechanical properties and selected performance criteria for gel spreading within the vaginal canal. Mixture design of experiment was used to establish a semi-empirical relationship linking composition-property and property-performance relationships for gels with varying concentrations of hydroxyethylcellulose and Carbopol 974P. This permits definition of a local optimum for gel composition and volume of administration, within a defined gel composition space. RESULTS: Rheological behavior and, consequently, the value of the objective function varied broadly with composition. The algorithm indicated a 3.0 wt% HEC gel as the near optimal composition for a 3.5 mL applied volume for gels designed to spread throughout the vagina. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced herein is a novel tool that facilitates an understanding of the composition-property-performance relationship for vaginal semisolid drug delivery gels. This approach has promise as a scientific methodology for evaluation and optimization of vaginal gels prior to in vivo investigations.
PURPOSE: Develop a preclinical in vitro algorithm enabling de novo design of semisolid vaginal drug delivery gels, by using biomechanical modeling of gel spreading in the vaginal canal and empirically relating gel composition to mechanical properties and predicted performance. METHODS: Gel performance was defined through a multivariate objective function constructed from gels' mechanical properties and selected performance criteria for gel spreading within the vaginal canal. Mixture design of experiment was used to establish a semi-empirical relationship linking composition-property and property-performance relationships for gels with varying concentrations of hydroxyethylcellulose and Carbopol 974P. This permits definition of a local optimum for gel composition and volume of administration, within a defined gel composition space. RESULTS: Rheological behavior and, consequently, the value of the objective function varied broadly with composition. The algorithm indicated a 3.0 wt% HEC gel as the near optimal composition for a 3.5 mL applied volume for gels designed to spread throughout the vagina. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced herein is a novel tool that facilitates an understanding of the composition-property-performance relationship for vaginal semisolid drug delivery gels. This approach has promise as a scientific methodology for evaluation and optimization of vaginal gels prior to in vivo investigations.
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; E Scott Pretorius; David M Shera; Mayadah Shabbout; Alka Shaunik Journal: Contraception Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Robert M Grant; Dean Hamer; Thomas Hope; Rowena Johnston; Joep Lange; Michael M Lederman; Judy Lieberman; Christopher J Miller; John P Moore; Donald E Mosier; Douglas D Richman; Robert T Schooley; Marty S Springer; Ronald S Veazey; Mark A Wainberg Journal: Science Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gita Ramjee; Neetha S Morar; Sarah Braunstein; Barbara Friedland; Heidi Jones; Janneke van de Wijgert Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Savas Tasoglu; Jennifer J Peters; Su Chan Park; Stéphane Verguet; David F Katz; Andrew J Szeri Journal: Phys Fluids (1994) Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.521
Authors: José A Fernández-Romero; Ciby J Abraham; Aixa Rodriguez; Larisa Kizima; Ninochka Jean-Pierre; Radhika Menon; Othell Begay; Samantha Seidor; Brian E Ford; Pedro I Gil; Jennifer Peters; David Katz; Melissa Robbiani; Thomas M Zydowsky Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kathleen M Morrow; Joseph L Fava; Rochelle K Rosen; Sara Vargas; Julia G Shaw; E Milu Kojic; Patrick F Kiser; David R Friend; David F Katz Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Marilyn Cost; Charlene S Dezzutti; Meredith R Clark; David R Friend; Ayman Akil; Lisa Cencia Rohan Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Claire J Forbes; Deborah Lowry; Leslie Geer; Ronald S Veazey; Robin J Shattock; Per Johan Klasse; Mark Mitchnick; Laurie Goldman; Lara A Doyle; Brendan C O Muldoon; A David Woolfson; John P Moore; R Karl Malcolm Journal: J Control Release Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Kate Morrow Guthrie; Shira Dunsiger; Sara E Vargas; Joseph L Fava; Julia G Shaw; Rochelle K Rosen; Patrick F Kiser; E Milu Kojic; David R Friend; David F Katz Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 2.205