OBJECTIVE: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a frequent event in cancer patients, with a prevalence from 19% to 95%. The reasons for such variability are explained by several factors, including different definitions across studies. In the framework of a wider initiative, we have analyzed the epidemiology of BTcP and identified factors associated with the pattern of care. METHODS: This study reports the results from a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study carried out in Italy between 2006 and 2007 on patients with cancer and pain. Transient exacerbations of pain were assessed with 3 different questions, and 1 composite variable to operationally define BTcP was then used as main outcome. After univariate analysis, a logistic model was also fitted to identify prognostic and predictive factors. RESULTS: One hundred and ten centers recruited 1801 cases of which 40.3% had BTcP at baseline. Most patients did not receive rescue therapy at the time of study inclusion. Univariate analysis identified several associations with clinical variables. A strong association has been also found with the type of recruiting centers, with oncologic wards reporting a somewhat lower proportion of patients with BTcP (-30%) when compared with palliative centers. Patients with BTcP had a high probability of dying (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7, P-value 0.006) and to change of the opioid with another for analgesic failure or for side effects (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-1.9, P-value 0.040) DISCUSSION: These findings confirm the high prevalence of BTcP and substantial undertreatment and identify a few factors associated with prevalence and prognosis.
OBJECTIVE:Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a frequent event in cancerpatients, with a prevalence from 19% to 95%. The reasons for such variability are explained by several factors, including different definitions across studies. In the framework of a wider initiative, we have analyzed the epidemiology of BTcP and identified factors associated with the pattern of care. METHODS: This study reports the results from a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study carried out in Italy between 2006 and 2007 on patients with cancer and pain. Transient exacerbations of pain were assessed with 3 different questions, and 1 composite variable to operationally define BTcP was then used as main outcome. After univariate analysis, a logistic model was also fitted to identify prognostic and predictive factors. RESULTS: One hundred and ten centers recruited 1801 cases of which 40.3% had BTcP at baseline. Most patients did not receive rescue therapy at the time of study inclusion. Univariate analysis identified several associations with clinical variables. A strong association has been also found with the type of recruiting centers, with oncologic wards reporting a somewhat lower proportion of patients with BTcP (-30%) when compared with palliative centers. Patients with BTcP had a high probability of dying (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7, P-value 0.006) and to change of the opioid with another for analgesic failure or for side effects (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-1.9, P-value 0.040) DISCUSSION: These findings confirm the high prevalence of BTcP and substantial undertreatment and identify a few factors associated with prevalence and prognosis.
Authors: Iryna A Khasabova; James Gielissen; Anisha Chandiramani; Catherine Harding-Rose; Desiree Abu Odeh; Donald A Simone; Virginia S Seybold Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Sebastiano Mercadante; Paolo Marchetti; Arturo Cuomo; Massimo Mammucari; Augusto Caraceni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Nguyen; K Luk; D Vang; W Soto; L Vincent; S Robiner; R Saavedra; Y Li; P Gupta; K Gupta Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2014-05-26 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Thomas Isaac; Sherri O Stuver; Roger B Davis; Susan Block; Jane C Weeks; Donna L Berry; Saul N Weingart Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Evelien J M Kuip; Maarten L Zandvliet; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 4.335