Literature DB >> 20841698

Participatory interaction design in user requirements specification in healthcare.

Susanna Martikainen1, Pauliina Ikävalko, Mikko Korpela.   

Abstract

Healthcare information systems are accused of poor usability even in the popular media in Finland. Doctors especially have been very critical and actively expressed their opinions in public. User involvement and user-centered design methods are seen as the key solution to usability problems. In this paper we describe a research case where participatory methods were experimented within healthcare information systems development in medicinal care in a hospital. The study was part of a larger research project on Activity-driven Information Systems Development in healthcare. The study started by finding out about and modeling the present state of medicinal care in the hospital. After that it was important to define and model the goal state. The goal state, facilitated by the would-be software package, was modeled with the help of user interface drawings as one way of prototyping. Traditional usability methods were extended during the study. According to the health professionals' feedback, the use of participatory and user-centered interaction design methods, particularly user interface drawings enabled them to describe their requirements and create common understanding with the system developers.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  2 in total

1.  Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets?

Authors:  Julie Chan; Kaveh G Shojania; Anthony C Easty; Edward E Etchells
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Using goal-directed design to create a novel system for improving chronic illness care.

Authors:  David Fore; Linda M Goldenhar; Peter A Margolis; Michael Seid
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-10-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.