Literature DB >> 20841521

Stress ulcer prophylaxis: reducing non-indicated prescribing after hospital discharge.

Jacob B Hatch1, Lucas Schulz, Jeffrey T Fish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric acid suppressant medications used as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often prescribed inappropriately after discharge. We present tools to reduce the use and cost of non-indicated SUP.
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the non-indicated use of SUP after hospital discharge originally started in the ICU, using an education intervention and pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on patient care rounds and at hospital discharge.
METHODS: In a retrospective medical record review using a historic control, 356 consecutively admitted patients to the medical/surgical ICU at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were assessed for the appropriate use of SUP at admission to the ICU, at transfer to a general care unit, and at hospital discharge. The education intervention involved teaching both the medical and pharmacist staff about indications for SUP using a memorandum and a pocket guide. Pharmacists also conducted medication reconciliation during daily patient care rounds and at discharge to justify medication use. The outcome of this study is the percentage of patients prescribed non-indicated gastric acid suppressants at hospital discharge. This outcome is compared to a previous study conducted at our hospital.
RESULTS: Of 356 eligible patients, 308 (86.5%) received SUP while in the ICU. Thirty-nine (11%) were given continuing SUP after discharge from the hospital, of which 31 (8.7%) had no clear indication. This was a 64.3% reduction from the 24.4% found in the prior study (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Educational materials that guide prescribing, pharmacist interaction on patient care rounds, and pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation significantly reduced the prescribing of non-indicated gastric acid suppressant medications after hospital discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841521     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1P167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  13 in total

1.  Impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Yeo Jin Choi; Joohyun Sim; Yun Tae Jung; Sooyoung Shin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Impact of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Discontinuation Guidance in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients: A Pre-Post Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christopher A Jones; Kevin D Betthauser; Bryan D Lizza; Paul A Juang; Scott T Micek; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-12-07

3.  Antipsychotic utilization in the intensive care unit and in transitions of care.

Authors:  John Marshall; Shoshana J Herzig; Michael D Howell; Stephen H Le; Chris Mathew; Julia S Kats; Jennifer P Stevens
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Evaluation of costs accrued through inadvertent continuation of hospital-initiated proton pump inhibitor therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Sooyoung Shin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Medication reconciliation as a medication safety initiative in Ethiopia: a study protocol.

Authors:  Alemayehu B Mekonnen; Andrew J McLachlan; Jo-Anne E Brien; Desalew Mekonnen; Zenahebezu Abay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of clinical pharmacist interventions on inappropriate prophylactic acid suppressant use in hepatobiliary surgical patients undergoing elective operations.

Authors:  Hongli Luo; Qingze Fan; Shunlin Xiao; Kun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of targeted educational interventions on appropriateness of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Drayton A Hammond; Catherine A Killingsworth; Jacob T Painter; Rose E Pennick; Kshitij Chatterjee; Bradley Boye; Nikhil Meena
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2017-08-15

8.  The effect of the TIM program (Transfer ICU Medication reconciliation) on medication transfer errors in two Dutch intensive care units: design of a prospective 8-month observational study with a before and after period.

Authors:  Bertha Elizabeth Bosma; Edmé Meuwese; Siok Swan Tan; Jasper van Bommel; Piet Herman Gerard Jan Melief; Nicole Geertruida Maria Hunfeld; Patricia Maria Lucia Adriana van den Bemt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A Successful Pharmacist-Based Quality Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in an Academic Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Umair Masood; Anuj Sharma; Zabeer Bhatti; Jessica Carroll; Amit Bhardwaj; Devamohan Sivalingam; Amit S Dhamoon
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  The effect of a medication reconciliation program in two intensive care units in the Netherlands: a prospective intervention study with a before and after design.

Authors:  Liesbeth B E Bosma; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Rogier A M Quax; Edmé Meuwese; Piet H G J Melief; Jasper van Bommel; SiokSwan Tan; Maaike J van Kranenburg; Patricia M L A van den Bemt
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.