Literature DB >> 20841388

Global levels of specific histone modifications and an epigenetic gene signature predict prostate cancer progression and development.

Tina Bianco-Miotto1, Karen Chiam, Grant Buchanan, Shalini Jindal, Tanya K Day, Mervyn Thomas, Marie A Pickering, Melissa A O'Loughlin, Natalie K Ryan, Wendy A Raymond, Lisa G Horvath, James G Kench, Phillip D Stricker, Villis R Marshall, Robert L Sutherland, Susan M Henshall, William L Gerald, Howard I Scher, Gail P Risbridger, Judith A Clements, Lisa M Butler, Wayne D Tilley, David J Horsfall, Carmela Ricciardelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic alterations are common in prostate cancer, yet how these modifications contribute to carcinogenesis is poorly understood. We investigated whether specific histone modifications are prognostic for prostate cancer relapse, and whether the expression of epigenetic genes is altered in prostate tumorigenesis.
METHODS: Global levels of histone H3 lysine-18 acetylation (H3K18Ac) and histone H3 lysine-4 dimethylation (H3K4diMe) were assessed immunohistochemically in a prostate cancer cohort of 279 cases. Epigenetic gene expression was investigated in silico by analysis of microarray data from 23 primary prostate cancers (8 with biochemical recurrence and 15 without) and 7 metastatic lesions.
RESULTS: H3K18Ac and H3K4diMe are independent predictors of relapse-free survival, with high global levels associated with a 1.71-fold (P < 0.0001) and 1.80-fold (P = 0.006) increased risk of tumor recurrence, respectively. High levels of both histone modifications were associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse (P < 0.0001). Epigenetic gene expression profiling identified a candidate gene signature (DNMT3A, MBD4, MLL2, MLL3, NSD1, and SRCAP), which significantly discriminated nonmalignant from prostate tumor tissue (P = 0.0063) in an independent cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has established the importance of histone modifications in predicting prostate cancer relapse and has identified an epigenetic gene signature associated with prostate tumorigenesis. IMPACT: Our findings suggest that targeting the epigenetic enzymes specifically involved in a particular solid tumor may be a more effective approach. Moreover, testing for aberrant expression of epigenetic genes such as those identified in this study may be beneficial in predicting individual patient response to epigenetic therapies. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841388     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  61 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the language of Lys36 methylation at histone H3.

Authors:  Eric J Wagner; Phillip B Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  The Role of Nuclear Receptor-Binding SET Domain Family Histone Lysine Methyltransferases in Cancer.

Authors:  Richard L Bennett; Alok Swaroop; Catalina Troche; Jonathan D Licht
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  Histone variants: emerging players in cancer biology.

Authors:  Chiara Vardabasso; Dan Hasson; Kajan Ratnakumar; Chi-Yeh Chung; Luis F Duarte; Emily Bernstein
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  An open and shut case for the role of NSD proteins as oncogenes.

Authors:  Agda Karina Lucio-Eterovic; Phillip B Carpenter
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2011-07

6.  High expression of Sirt7 served as a predictor of adverse outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Qian Geng; Haoyu Peng; Fengsheng Chen; Rongcheng Luo; Rong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-02-01

7.  Histone modifications and cancer: biomarkers of prognosis?

Authors:  Yana Chervona; Max Costa
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  KDM5B Is Essential for the Hyperactivation of PI3K/AKT Signaling in Prostate Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Guoliang Li; Thanigaivelan Kanagasabai; Wenfu Lu; Mike R Zou; Shang-Min Zhang; Sherly I Celada; Michael G Izban; Qi Liu; Tao Lu; Billy R Ballard; Xinchun Zhou; Samuel E Adunyah; Robert J Matusik; Qin Yan; Zhenbang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alison Y Zhang; Karen Chiam; Ygal Haupt; Stephen Fox; Simone Birch; Wayne Tilley; Lisa M Butler; Karen Knudsen; Clay Comstock; Krishan Rasiah; Judith Grogan; Kate L Mahon; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Carmela Ricciardelli; Maret Böhm; Susan Henshall; Warick Delprado; Phillip Stricker; Lisa G Horvath; James G Kench
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Akt-dependent metabolic reprogramming regulates tumor cell histone acetylation.

Authors:  Joyce V Lee; Alessandro Carrer; Supriya Shah; Nathaniel W Snyder; Shuanzeng Wei; Sriram Venneti; Andrew J Worth; Zuo-Fei Yuan; Hee-Woong Lim; Shichong Liu; Ellen Jackson; Nicole M Aiello; Naomi B Haas; Timothy R Rebbeck; Alexander Judkins; Kyoung-Jae Won; Lewis A Chodosh; Benjamin A Garcia; Ben Z Stanger; Michael D Feldman; Ian A Blair; Kathryn E Wellen
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.