| Literature DB >> 20840784 |
Eli Fjeld Falnes1, Thorkild Tylleskär, Marina Manuela de Paoli, Rachel Manongi, Ingunn M S Engebretsen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 90% of children living with HIV have been infected through mother to child transmission. The aims of our present study were to: (1) assess the utilization of the prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) services in five reproductive and child health clinics in Moshi, northern Tanzania, after the implementation of routine counselling and testing; (2) explore the level of knowledge the postnatal mothers had about PMTCT; and (3) assess the quality of the counselling given.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20840784 PMCID: PMC3161341 DOI: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int AIDS Soc ISSN: 1758-2652 Impact factor: 5.396
Study aims and the quantitative and qualitative methods applied to answer them
| Study aim | Quantitative method | Qualitative method | Mixed methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survey of 426 postnatal mothers | 4 focus group discussions with mothers | Concurrent triangulation: quantitative and qualitative data were separately collected and analysed. The methods were integrated when interpreting the results. | |
| 8 in-depth interviews with mothers | |||
| 5 in-depth interviews with nurse counsellors | |||
| 4 observations of PMTCT counsellings | |||
| 1) Assessment of the utilization of the PMTCT services, in particular HIV counselling and testing, in five reproductive and child health clinics in Moshi after the implementation of routine counselling and testing | Descriptive statistics: | Exploring the mothers': | Quantification of the utilization of the PMTCT service in terms of numbers of mothers counselled and tested |
| quantitative + qualitative aim | Frequencies of: | Attitudes to the PMTCT programme | And |
| Antenatal attendance | Experiences of the programme | Insight into experiences and attitudes to the programme among the mothers and the nurse counsellors (the social and subjective context) | |
| Received counselling | Barriers to the utilization of the programme | ||
| Offered test | Exploring the nurse counsellors': | ||
| Tested | experiences of the mothers acceptance and utilization of the programme | ||
| Received results | perceived barriers to the programme | ||
| Urban/rural comparison: Pearson χ2 | |||
| 2) Exploring the level of knowledge the mothers had about PMTCT | Descriptive statistics: | Exploring the mothers': | Quantification of the mother's knowledge on the different questions, compare groups and assess associations |
| quantitative + qualitative aim | Frequencies of: | Knowledge about PMTCT | And |
| Percentage of correct answers to the different questions about PMTCT | misconceptions regarding PMTCT | Validate these findings through a qualitative approach | |
| Urban/rural comparison: Pearson χ2 | Reveal and explore misconceptions | ||
| Logistic regression: assessment of factors associated with having little knowledge about PMTCT | |||
| 3) Assessment of the quality of the counselling given | Descriptive statistics: | Exploring the mothers': | Quantify numbers of mothers counselled |
| predominant qualitative aim | Frequencies of: | Experience of and opinions about the counselling received | Indirectly measured by the level of knowledge |
| Mothers who had received information on HIV and infant feeding counselling | Understanding of the subjects covered | And | |
| Indirectly measured by the level of PMTCT knowledge | Exploring the nurse counsellors': | Insight into which subjects the mothers were actually counselled in and which were lacking | |
| Knowledge about PMTCT | Insight into the knowledge and confidence of the nurse counsellors and their perceived barriers to the counselling | ||
| Perceptions about the counselling given | Insight into the counselling session and the communication during the counselling | ||
| Perception about barriers to the counselling | |||
| Exploration of the counselling sessions: | |||
| Subjects covered | |||
| Level of communication between counsellor and mother |
Figure 1Mixed methods: concurrent triangulation.
Percentage of correct answers to the different questions about PMTCT by type of clinic attended
| Question | All included | Subgroup analysis S | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural clinic | Urban clinic | |||
| Is it possible that both parents are positive and the newborn negative? i | 363 (85.2) | 62 (79.5) | 203 (87.1) | |
| When can HIV be passed from mother to child? | During pregnancy i | 262 (61.5) | 23 (29.5) | 163 (70.0)*** |
| During labour i | 414 (97.2) | 78 (100.0) | 229 (98.3) | |
| Through breastfeeding i | 425 (99.8) | 78 (100.0) | 233 (100.0) | |
| Sexual intercourse | 262 (61.5) | 19 (24.4) | 170 (73.0)*** | |
| If there are 10 HIV-infected pregnant women, how many babies can be born with HIV? i | 1-3 | 78 (18.3) | 13 (16.7) | 41 (17.6) |
| Would you know the number of babies that could get infected through breastfeeding out of | 1-3 | 161 (37.8) | 12 (15.4) | 109 (46.8)*** |
| Can a mother do anything to reduce the risk of transmission to her child during pregnancy? i | 350 (82.2) | 60 (76.9) | 202 (86.7) | |
| If yes, what can she do? | Take medicine | 344 (80.8) | 58 (74.4) | 201 (86.3) |
| Use condom | 232 (54.5) | 10 (12.8) | 161 (69.1)*** | |
| Can an HIV-infected mother do anything to reduce the risk of transmission to her child | 305 (71.6) | 31 (39.7) | 193 (82.8)*** | |
| If yes, what can she do? | EBF | 215 (50.5) | 14 (17.9) | 145 (62.2)*** |
| Use condom | 159 (37.3) | 2 (2.6) | 113 (48.5)*** | |
| Formula milk | 304 (71.4) | 31 (39.7) | 192 (82.4)*** | |
| Cow's milk | 303 (71.1) | 29 (37.2) | 193 (82.8)*** | |
| Breast care | 261 (61.3) | 19 (24.4) | 174 (74.7)*** | |
| Oral thrush | 265 (62.2) | 18 (23.1) | 177 (76.0)*** | |
S Subgroup analysis (n = 311) of rural and urban clinic does not add up
i Included in the PMTCT knowledge index
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001
Baseline characteristics of the 426 surveyed mothers by type of clinic attended
| Background factor | All included | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural clinic | Urban clinic | ||
| Residence | |||
| Rural | 193 (45.3) | 76 (97.4) | 50 (21.5) |
| Urban | 233 (54.7) | 2 (2.6) | 183 (78.5)*** |
| Mothers' age, y | |||
| < = 25 | 219 (51.4) | 45 (57.7) | 110 (47.2) |
| >25 | 207 (48.6) | 33 (42.3) | 123 (52.8) |
| Number of siblings | |||
| 0 | 169 (39.7) | 34 (43.6) | 79 (33.9) |
| 1 | 132 (31.0) | 20 (25.6) | 80 (34.3) |
| < = 2 | 125 (29.3) | 24 (30.8) | 74 (31.8) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married/cohabiting | 384 (90.1) | 67 (85.9) | 213 (91.4) |
| Single/divorced/widow | 42 (9.9) | 11 (14.1) | 20 (8.6) |
| Religion | |||
| Catholic | 186 (43.7) | 49 (62.8) | 92 (39.5) |
| Protestant | 162 (38.0) | 25 (32.1) | 93 (39.9) |
| Muslim/other | 78 (18.3) | 4 (5.1) | 48 (20.6)** |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Chagga | 266 (62.4) | 66 (84.6) | 135 (57.9) |
| Pare/other | 160 (37.6) | 12 (15.4) | 98 (42.1)*** |
| Education, mother | |||
| 0-6 | 23 (5.4) | 5 (6.4) | 9 (3.9) |
| 7 | 212 (49.8) | 45 (57.7) | 113 (48.5) |
| 8-12 | 146 (34.3) | 21 (26.9) | 83 (35.6) |
| 12+ | 45 (10.6) | 7 (9.0) | 28 (12.0) |
| Socio-economic status | |||
| Bottom quintile | 81 (19.0) | 28 (35.9) | 27 (11.6)*** |
| 2nd quintile | 88 (20.7) | 22 (28.2) | 41 (17.6) |
| 3rd quintile | 94 (22.1) | 17 (21.8) | 56 (24.0) |
| 4th quintile | 65 (15.3) | 8 (10.3) | 41 (17.6) |
| Top quintile | 98 (23.0) | 3 (3.8) | 68 (29.2) |
S Subgroup analysis (n = 311) of rural and urban clinic does not add up
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001
PMTCT practice of the 428 surveyed mothers by type of clinic attended
| Practice | All included | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural clinic | Urban clinic | ||
| Heard about PMTCT programme | 394 (92.5) | 71 (91.0) | 221 (94.8) |
| Received infant feeding counselling | 279 (65.5) | 47 (60.3) | 169 (72.5) |
| Received information about HIV | 403 (94.6) | 75 (96.2) | 226 (97.0) |
| Offered HIV test | 416 (97.7) | 78 (100.0) | 232 (99.6) |
| Did test | 416 (97.7) | 78 (100.0) | 232 (99.6) |
| Received results | 415 (97.4) | 78 (100.0) | 231 (99.1) |
S Subgroup analysis (n = 311) of rural and urban clinic does not add up
* p < 0.05
Figure 2Knowledge score PMTCT by type of clinic attended.
Odds ratio of little knowledge about PMTCT for all the 426 surveyed mothers
| Background factor | N = 426 (%) | Little knowledge | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMTCT N (%) | ||||
| Mothers' age, y | ||||
| < = 25 | 219 (51.4) | 89 (40.6) | 1 | 1 |
| >25 | 207 (48.6) | 102 (49.3) | 1.419 (0.967-2.082) | 1.842 (1.119-3.032)* |
| Number of siblings | ||||
| 0 | 169 (39.7) | 85 (50.3) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 132 (31.0) | 43 (32.6) | 0.477 (0.298-0.766)** | 0.454 (0.266-0.776)** |
| < = 2 | 125 (29.3) | 63 (50.4) | 1.004 (0.632-1.595) | 0.654 (0.358-1.193) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married/cohabiting | 384 (90.1) | 169 (44.0) | 1 | |
| Single/divorced/widow | 42 (9.9) | 22 (52.4) | 1.399 (0.739-2.649) | |
| Religion | ||||
| Christian | 350 (81.7) | 150 (43.1) | 1 | 1 |
| Muslim/other | 78 (18.3) | 41 (52.6) | 1.463 (0.894-2.394) | 1.725 (1.006-2.956)* |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Chagga | 266 (62.4) | 127 (47.7) | 1 | |
| Pare/other | 160 (37.6) | 64 (40.0) | 0.730 (0.490-1.086) | |
| Education, y | ||||
| 0-7 | 235 (55.2) | 105 (44.7) | 1 | |
| 8+ | 191 (44.8) | 86 (45.0) | 1.014 (0.691-1.489) | |
| Socio-economic status | ||||
| Lowest 60% | 263 (61.7) | 131 (49.8) | 1 | |
| Highest 40% | 163 (38.3) | 60 (36.8) | 0.587 (0.394-0.875)** | |
| Antenatal clinic | ||||
| Rural | 78 (18.3) | 55 (70.5) | 1 | 1 |
| Urban | 233 (54.7) | 82 (35.2) | 0.227 (0.130-0.396)*** | 0.232 (0.127-0.425)*** |
| Other | 115 (27.0) | 54 (47.0) | 0.370 (0.201-0.681)** | 0.298 (0.153-0.578)*** |
| First visit antenatal | ||||
| Early (1st and 2nd trimester) | 370 (86.9) | 153 (41.4) | 1 | 1 |
| Late (3rd trimester) | 56 (13.1) | 38 (67.9) | 2.994 (1.647-5.444)*** | 2.154 (1.111-4.177)* |
| Number antenatal visits | ||||
| 1-2 | 52 (12.2) | 27 (51.9) | 1 | |
| 3+ | 374 (87.8) | 164 (43.9) | 0.723 (0.404-1.293) | |
| Received infant feeding counselling | ||||
| Yes | 279 (65.5) | 100 (35.8) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 149 (34.5) | 91 (61.9) | 2.909 (1.924-4.397)*** | 2.303 (1.467-3.616)*** |
| Received HIV information | ||||
| Yes | 403 (94.6) | 175 (43.4) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 25 (5.4) | 16 (69.6) | 2.978 (1.119-7.396)* | 1.991 (0.738-5.372) |
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001