BACKGROUND: Randomized trials and meta-analyses indicate positive effects of stroke unit (SU) care on survival and dependency of patients with stroke. However, data on the advantages of SU in 'real-world' settings are limited. We prospectively assessed, in a large University Hospital, the effect of SU versus other conventional wards (OCW) care on all-cause mortality, death or dependency, death or institutionalization. METHODS: In a prospective observational study in the European Registers of Stroke Project, patients hospitalized for first-in-a-lifetime stroke were evaluated for demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, resource use, 3-month and 1-year survival, and functional outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 355 patients (54.1% men, mean age 73.4 ± 14.5 years) were registered, 140 (39.4%) admitted to the SU, and 215 (60.6%) to OCW. OCW patients were older, whilst SU patients had more severe strokes according to NIHSS (P for trend = 0.025). SU patients were significantly more often treated by specialists in stroke medicine, stroke nurses, physiotherapists and speech therapists (all P < 0.001), psychologists (P = 0.025), dietitians (P < 0.001), and social workers (P = 0.003). MRI, carotid, and transcranial Doppler were significantly more often performed in SU patients (all P < 0.001). Intravenous fluids (P = 0.003) and intravenous anticoagulation (P < 0.001) were more often prescribed in SU. Controlling for case-mix, SU significantly reduced 1-year mortality (P = 0.020), death or dependency at 3 months (P = 0.006) and 1 year (P = 0.043), and death or institutionalization at 3 months (P = 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the benefits of SU care in a clinical setting. Further analyses should define the contribution of individual components of care to stroke outcome.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials and meta-analyses indicate positive effects of stroke unit (SU) care on survival and dependency of patients with stroke. However, data on the advantages of SU in 'real-world' settings are limited. We prospectively assessed, in a large University Hospital, the effect of SU versus other conventional wards (OCW) care on all-cause mortality, death or dependency, death or institutionalization. METHODS: In a prospective observational study in the European Registers of Stroke Project, patients hospitalized for first-in-a-lifetime stroke were evaluated for demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, resource use, 3-month and 1-year survival, and functional outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 355 patients (54.1% men, mean age 73.4 ± 14.5 years) were registered, 140 (39.4%) admitted to the SU, and 215 (60.6%) to OCW. OCW patients were older, whilst SUpatients had more severe strokes according to NIHSS (P for trend = 0.025). SUpatients were significantly more often treated by specialists in stroke medicine, stroke nurses, physiotherapists and speech therapists (all P < 0.001), psychologists (P = 0.025), dietitians (P < 0.001), and social workers (P = 0.003). MRI, carotid, and transcranial Doppler were significantly more often performed in SUpatients (all P < 0.001). Intravenous fluids (P = 0.003) and intravenous anticoagulation (P < 0.001) were more often prescribed in SU. Controlling for case-mix, SU significantly reduced 1-year mortality (P = 0.020), death or dependency at 3 months (P = 0.006) and 1 year (P = 0.043), and death or institutionalization at 3 months (P = 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the benefits of SU care in a clinical setting. Further analyses should define the contribution of individual components of care to stroke outcome.
Authors: Melanie Turner; Mark Barber; Hazel Dodds; Martin Dennis; Peter Langhorne; Mary Joan Macleod Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 10.154