Literature DB >> 20840150

Multicenter evaluation of prototype real-time PCR assays for Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood samples from transplant recipients.

Yoshinori Ito1, Shunji Takakura, Satoshi Ichiyama, Mitsuharu Ueda, Yukio Ando, Kazuyuki Matsuda, Eiko Hidaka, Kaname Nakatani, Junji Nishioka, Tsutomu Nobori, Naoki Kajiyama, Hiroshi Kimura.   

Abstract

Quantitative PCR is becoming widespread for diagnosing and monitoring post-transplantation diseases associated with EBV and CMV. These assays need to be standardized to manage patients in different facilities. Five independent laboratories in Japan compared home-brew assays and a prototype assay system to establish a standard quantitative procedure for measuring EBV and CMV. Reference standards and a total of 816 (642 EBV and 174 CMV) whole blood samples from post-transplantation recipients were used for this multicenter evaluation. The prototype reference standard for EBV was compared to a panel of samples, with a theoretical expected value made using EBV-positive cells containing two virus genome copies per cell. The mean ratio of the reference standard at each site to the standard of the prototype assay was ≤ 4.15 for EBV among three different sites and ≤ 3.0 for CMV between two laboratories. The mean of the theoretical expected number of the EBV genome: prototype reference was close to 1.0. The correlation coefficients between the viral copy numbers determined using the prototype assay and those using each home-brew assay were high (EBV, 0.73-0.83, median = 0.78; CMV, 0.54-0.60, median = 0.57). The dynamics of the EBV and CMV loads in transplant recipients were similar between the assay types. There was an inter-laboratory difference among the quantification results, indicating that a unified protocol and kit are favorable for standardizing the quantification of EBV and CMV. Such standardization will help to standardize the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases associated with EBV and CMV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20840150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0385-5600            Impact factor:   1.955


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of commercial extraction systems and PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in whole blood.

Authors:  Raphaële Germi; Julien Lupo; Touyana Semenova; Sylvie Larrat; Nelly Magnat; Laurence Grossi; Jean-Marie Seigneurin; Patrice Morand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Three Nucleic Acid-Based Assays for BK Virus Quantification.

Authors:  Veronique Descamps; Elodie Martin; Virginie Morel; Catherine François; François Helle; Gilles Duverlie; Sandrine Castelain; Etienne Brochot
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Current State of PCR-Based Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Testing for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly Y Kim; Quynh-Thu Le; Sue S Yom; Benjamin A Pinsky; Scott V Bratman; Raymond H W Ng; Haja S El Mubarak; K C Allen Chan; Miriam Sander; Barbara A Conley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Multicenter comparison of laboratory performance in cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viral load testing using international standards.

Authors:  Jenna Rychert; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Belinda Yen-Lieberman; Gregory Storch; Richard Buller; Stewart C Sweet; Aneesh K Mehta; Jennifer A Cheeseman; Peter Heeger; Eric S Rosenberg; Jay A Fishman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.863

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.