Literature DB >> 20839871

Agricultural impacts of glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivation in South America.

Antonio L Cerdeira1, Dionsio L P Gazziero, Stephen O Duke, Marcus B Matallo.   

Abstract

In the 2009/2010 growing season, Brazil was the second largest world soybean producer, followed by Argentina. Glyphosate-resistant soybeans (GRS) are being cultivated in most of the soybean area in South America. Overall, the GRS system is beneficial to the environment when compared to conventional soybean. GRS resulted in a significant shift toward no-tillage practices in Brazil and Argentina, but weed resistance may reduce this trend. Probably the highest agricultural risk in adopting GRS in Brazil and South America is related to weed resistance due to use of glyphosate. Weed species in GRS fields have shifted in Brazil to those that can more successfully withstand glyphosate or to those that avoid the time of its application. Five weed species, in order of importance, Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist, Lolium multiflorum Lam., Digitaria insularis (L.) Mez ex Ekman, and Euphorbia heterophylla L., have evolved resistance to glyphosate in GRS in Brazil. Conyza spp. are the most difficult to control. A glyphosate-resistant biotype of Sorghum halepense L. has evolved in GRS in Argentina and one of D. insularis in Paraguay. The following actions are proposed to minimize weed resistance problem: (a) rotation of GRS with conventional soybeans in order to rotate herbicide modes of action; (b) avoidance of lower than recommended glyphosate rates; (c) keeping soil covered with a crop or legume at intercrop intervals; (d) keeping machinery free of weed seeds; and (d) use of a preplant nonselective herbicide plus residuals to eliminate early weed interference with the crop and to minimize escapes from later applications of glyphosate due to natural resistance of older weeds and/or incomplete glyphosate coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839871     DOI: 10.1021/jf102652y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics in Pest Status of Phytophagous Stink Bugs in the Neotropics.

Authors:  Antônio Ricardo Panizzi; Tiago Lucini; Jeffrey R Aldrich
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Assessment of genetically modified soybean in relation to natural variation in the soybean seed metabolome.

Authors:  Joseph D Clarke; Danny C Alexander; Dennis P Ward; John A Ryals; Matthew W Mitchell; Jacob E Wulff; Lining Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Glyphosate Residues in Groundwater, Drinking Water and Urine of Subsistence Farmers from Intensive Agriculture Localities: A Survey in Hopelchén, Campeche, Mexico.

Authors:  Jaime Rendon-von Osten; Ricardo Dzul-Caamal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Beyond conservation agriculture.

Authors:  Ken E Giller; Jens A Andersson; Marc Corbeels; John Kirkegaard; David Mortensen; Olaf Erenstein; Bernard Vanlauwe
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; Michael N Antoniou; Bruce Blumberg; Lynn Carroll; Theo Colborn; Lorne G Everett; Michael Hansen; Philip J Landrigan; Bruce P Lanphear; Robin Mesnage; Laura N Vandenberg; Frederick S Vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; Charles M Benbrook
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.

Authors:  Charles M Benbrook
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.893

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.