Literature DB >> 20839229

Convenient, multi-well plate-based DNA damage response analysis using DT40 mutants is applicable to a high-throughput genotoxicity assay with characterization of modes of action.

John R Ridpath1, Shunichi Takeda, James A Swenberg, Jun Nakamura.   

Abstract

Chemists continually synthesize myriad new chemicals (∼2,000/year), some of which make their way into the environment or otherwise pose possible threats to humans who potentially become exposed to the compounds. Regulators must determine whether these, along with the glut (∼80,000) of existing, chemicals are toxic and at what exposure levels. An important component of this determination is to ascertain the mode of action (MOA) of each compound as it relates to the pathway the compound uses to induce genotoxicity. Several assays have traditionally been used to reveal these effects to the genome: the Ames test, tests with yeast and mammalian cell lines, and animal studies. Previously, we described a new multi-well plate-based method which makes use of the DT40 isogenic cell line and its dozens of available mutants knocked out in DNA repair and cell cycle pathways and we now provide a detailed protocol of the further improvement of the assay. Although the DT40 line has existed for some time and has been used in numerous studies of DNA repair pathways, little use has been made of this valuable resource for toxicological investigations. Our method introduces the 2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide dye scheme determination of cell survival in a manner that greatly increases throughput and reduces cost while maintaining reasonable sensitivity. Although this new genotoxicity assay requires validation with many more mutagens before becoming an established, regulatory decision-making analysis tool, we believe that this method will be very advantageous if eventually added to the repertoire of those investigating MOAs of potentially genotoxic substances.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20839229      PMCID: PMC3280086          DOI: 10.1002/em.20595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  25 in total

Review 1.  Reverse genetic studies of homologous DNA recombination using the chicken B-lymphocyte line, DT40.

Authors:  E Sonoda; C Morrison; Y M Yamashita; M Takata; S Takeda
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  DNA repair studies: experimental evidence in support of chicken DT40 cell line as a unique model.

Authors:  P K Dhar; E Sonoda; A Fujimori; Y M Yamashita; S Takeda
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.567

Review 3.  Immunoglobulin diversification in DT40: a model for vertebrate DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Julian E Sale
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-07-02

Review 4.  Reverse genetic studies of the DNA damage response in the chicken B lymphocyte line DT40.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe; Eiichiro Sonoda; Helfrid Hochegger; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

5.  Increased ratio of targeted to random integration after transfection of chicken B cell lines.

Authors:  J M Buerstedde; S Takeda
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-10-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Cell lines derived from avian lymphomas exhibit two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  T W Baba; B P Giroir; E H Humphries
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test.

Authors:  D M Maron; B N Ames
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Extensive chromosomal breaks are induced by tamoxifen and estrogen in DNA repair-deficient cells.

Authors:  Aki Mizutani; Takashi Okada; Shinya Shibutani; Eiichiro Sonoda; Helfrid Hochegger; Chikako Nishigori; Yoshiki Miyachi; Shunichi Takeda; Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Disparity between DNA base excision repair in yeast and mammals: translational implications.

Authors:  Mark R Kelley; Yoke W Kow; David M Wilson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  A novel approach using DNA-repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines for screening and characterizing the genotoxicity of environmental contaminants.

Authors:  Kyunghee Ji; Toshiaki Kogame; Kyungho Choi; Xin Wang; Jinyoung Lee; Yoshihito Taniguchi; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  17 in total

1.  Screening Nonionic Surfactants for Enhanced Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Remaining in Soil After Conventional Biological Treatment.

Authors:  Alden C Adrion; Jun Nakamura; Damian Shea; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Evaluating the effects of bioremediation on genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using genetically engineered, higher eukaryotic cell lines.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Jun Nakamura; Stephen D Richardson; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  The endogenous exposome.

Authors:  Jun Nakamura; Esra Mutlu; Vyom Sharma; Leonard Collins; Wanda Bodnar; Rui Yu; Yongquan Lai; Benjamin Moeller; Kun Lu; James Swenberg
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-24

4.  A novel model to characterize structure and function of BRCA1.

Authors:  Dong Lin; Reza Izadpanah; Stephen E Braun; Eckhard Alt
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Incorporation of metabolic activation potentiates cyclophosphamide-induced DNA damage response in isogenic DT40 mutant cells.

Authors:  Kiyohiro Hashimoto; Shunichi Takeda; James A Swenberg; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Aerobic Bioremediation of PAH Contaminated Soil Results in Increased Genotoxicity and Developmental Toxicity.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Mitra C Geier; Jun Nakamura; Robert L Tanguay; Michael D Aitken; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Bioavailability of (Geno)toxic Contaminants in Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil Before and After Biological Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Alden C Adrion; Jun Nakamura; Damian Shea; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.907

8.  Improving Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Biodegradation in Contaminated Soil Through Low-Level Surfactant Addition After Conventional Bioremediation.

Authors:  Alden C Adrion; David R Singleton; Jun Nakamura; Damian Shea; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.907

9.  Editor's Highlight: High-Throughput Functional Genomics Identifies Modulators of TCE Metabolite Genotoxicity and Candidate Susceptibility Genes.

Authors:  Vanessa Y De La Rosa; Jonathan Asfaha; Michael Fasullo; Alex Loguinov; Peng Li; Lee E Moore; Nathaniel Rothman; Jun Nakamura; James A Swenberg; Ghislaine Scelo; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Chris D Vulpe
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.