Literature DB >> 20838357

Intravitreal bevacizumab and/or macular photocoagulation as a primary treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Kamal A M Solaiman1, Mohammad M Diab, Mostafa Abo-Elenin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) followed by modified grid laser photocoagulation (MGP) versus each alone as a primary treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized 3-arm clinical trial in which 62 eyes of 48 patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema were enrolled. Eyes were randomly distributed to 1 of 3 study groups: 19 eyes underwent MGP (MGP group), 21 eyes received 1.25 mg of IVB (IVB group), and 22 eyes received IVB followed by MGP (combined group). All eyes underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months, after treatment. Fluorescein angiography was performed at the 3 and 6 months follow up visits. The outcome measures were the change compared with baseline in central macular thickness (CMT), changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in fluorescein angiography leakage, and any reported complication. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: One month after treatment, the reduction in the mean CMT versus baseline was 49.88 μm (10.45%) in MGP group, 150.92 μm (31.30%) in IVB group, and 110.30 μm (23.77%) in the combined group, with a corresponding improvement in the mean BCVA. At 1 month, the improvement in CMT was better than baseline in all groups, yet only significant in the IVB group (P < 0.05) and the combined group (P < 0.05). The improvement in mean BCVA was significant in the IVB (P < 0.05) and the combined groups at 1 month (P < 0.05). At 3 months, the mean CMT was still better than baseline in all groups but this improvement was significant only in the combined group (P < 0.05). The improvement in the mean BCVA was significant only in the IVB and the combined groups (P < 0.05). Six months after treatment, the reduction in the mean CMT was significant in the combined group only (P < 0.05) and there was no significant improvement in the mean BCVA in all groups (P > 0.05). The BCVA did not deteriorate below baseline in all eyes included in the study, except three eyes in the MGP group. No complication related to the intravitreal injection was reported in the injected eyes.
CONCLUSION: Combined therapy with IVB and sequential MGP 3 weeks later appeared to be superior to MGP or IVB alone in reducing macular thickening and improving visual acuity. However, no significant improvement in BCVA occurs 6 months after treatment. A combination of IVB and sequential MGP could be used as an initial treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20838357     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e1ed07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  26 in total

1.  Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab with macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systemic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Liu; Xiao-Dong Zhou; Zhi Wang; Hong-Jie Shen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Residual edema evaluation with ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg formulations for diabetic macular edema (REEF study).

Authors:  D S Dhoot; D J Pieramici; M Nasir; A A Castellarin; S Couvillion; R F See; N Steinle; M Bennett; M Rabena; R L Avery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Efficacy and safety of topical difluprednate in persistent diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Savleen Kaur; Sonam Yangzes; Swati Singh; Nishant Sachdev
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Intravitreal bevacizumab versus posterior subtenon triamcinolone in diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Shaveta Bhayana; Sunandan Sood; Subina Narang; Neha Khurana Sethi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Diabetic macular oedema: pathophysiology, management challenges and treatment resistance.

Authors:  Bobak Bahrami; Meidong Zhu; Thomas Hong; Andrew Chang
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Optical Coherence Tomography Features in Diabetic Macular Edema and the Impact on Anti-VEGF Response.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Daniel Petkovsek; Peter K Kaiser; Rishi P Singh; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.300

7.  Current treatments in diabetic macular oedema: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Alexander Ford; Noemi Lois; Pamela Royle; Christine Clar; Deepson Shyangdan; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cost-effectiveness of treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Suzann Pershing; Eva A Enns; Brian Matesic; Douglas K Owens; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Single injection of triamcinolone versus three repeated injections of bevacizumab for treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Mehmet Taş; Veysi Oner; Mehmet Fuat Alakuş; Fatih Mehmet Türkcü; Yalçın Işcan; Kemal Yüksel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Diabetic retinopathy - An update.

Authors:  Abdulrahman A Alghadyan
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.