Literature DB >> 20838136

Poorer outcomes for mass casualty events victims: is it evidence based?

Kobi Peleg1, Michael Rozenfeld, Michael Stein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sudden influx of patients during mass casualty events (MCEs) may compromise the quality of care provided and possibly impact on the medical outcomes of these patients. To test this assumption, a comparison must be made between injuries sustained in MCE and non-MCE events caused by the same mechanism. The mechanism of injury selected for this study was gunshot wounds, which occur in both types of event.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out using the Israel's National Trauma Registry data on patients hospitalized between November 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, as a result of high-energy gunshot trauma. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to characterize injury patterns, and multivariate analysis was used to determine factors influencing inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: Of 462 patients with gunshot wounds, 120 cases (26.38%) were defined as MCE and 342 (73.62%) as non-MCE. Both populations had ∼30% of severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score 16+). MCE patients had undergone significantly fewer operational procedures. No differences between MCE and non-MCE were found in intensive care units utilization. The likelihood of death as a result of MCE was 2.75 (CI 1.09-7.02) times higher than non-MCE. Factors influencing this difference are the number of injured regions and injuries to the brain, chest, and abdomen.
CONCLUSIONS: MCE patients have a significantly higher mortality than non-MCE patients, not manifesting substantial differences in the severity of injuries. The absence of difference in intensive care units utilization may be related to the effectiveness of existing protocols for dealing with MCEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20838136     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e7bbfc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  5 in total

Review 1.  Emergency imaging after a mass casualty incident: role of the radiology department during training for and activation of a disaster management plan.

Authors:  Ferco H Berger; Markus Körner; Mark P Bernstein; Aaron D Sodickson; Ludo F Beenen; Patrick D McLaughlin; Digna R Kool; Ronald M Bilow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Utstein-style template for uniform data reporting of acute medical response in disasters.

Authors:  Michel Debacker; Ives Hubloue; Erwin Dhondt; Gerald Rockenschaub; Anders Rüter; Tudor Codreanu; Kristi L Koenig; Carl Schultz; Kobi Peleg; Pinchas Halpern; Samuel Stratton; Francesco Della Corte; Herman Delooz; Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Davide Colombo; Maaret Castrèn
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2012-03-23

3.  Evaluation of a novel algorithm for primary mass casualty triage by paramedics in a physician manned EMS system: a dummy based trial.

Authors:  Philipp Wolf; Marc Bigalke; Bernhard M Graf; Torsten Birkholz; Michael S Dittmar
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  SIMEDIS: a Discrete-Event Simulation Model for Testing Responses to Mass Casualty Incidents.

Authors:  Michel Debacker; Filip Van Utterbeeck; Christophe Ullrich; Erwin Dhondt; Ives Hubloue
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Pre-hospital management of mass casualty civilian shootings: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Conor D A Turner; David J Lockey; Marius Rehn
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.